Talk:Cu Lao Cham Marine Park
Cu Lao Cham Marine Park was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 20, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the ecosystems of the Cham Islands (pictured) in Vietnam were recognized as a global Biosphere Reserve, the Cu Lao Cham Marine Park, by UNESCO on 26 May 2009? |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cu Lao Cham Marine Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to https://www.vietnamtourism-jsc.com/360-travel/detail/26-cham-island-vietnam-–-a-part-of-the-world’s-lung.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721225351/http://www.net-lanna.info/biodiversity/Abstract/53006159.pdf to http://www.net-lanna.info/biodiversity/Abstract/53006159.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Cu Lao Cham Marine Park/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 10:07, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
I propose reviewing this article which I see has been waiting nearly 8 months for review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:07, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
First reading
edit- The lead should be a summary of the main body of text. It should not contain anything that is not dealt with below, and should not there fore need any citations because everything should be sourced in the main text.
- In the Topography section, you first give the names of the islands and their English equivalents, and that's fine. The second paragraph talks about the island of Hòn Lao. So what about the topography of the other islands?
- The third paragraph deals with the marshes. What about the other habitats?
- The biodiversity section does mention some other habitats, but it is all a bit listy.
- The only terrestrial animal mentioned is the swallow and that is mentioned in excessive detail.
- The history section is entirely about the Cham people and not about the Cu Lao Cham Marine Park itself.
- I will look at the Integrated management section later as I have other things I must attend to now. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:40, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Onhold
editNobody seems to be taking responsibility for this review so I am putting the review on hold for seven days. The main deficit is in Criteria 3a and 3b. The article is insufficiently broad in its coverage of the topic, but is too detailed in its approach to certain aspects, the swallows for example. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:54, 13 April 2019 (UTC)