Talk:CyberJoly Drim
Latest comment: 1 month ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from CyberJoly Drim appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 October 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | Antonina Liedtke was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 3 August 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into CyberJoly Drim. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 00:58, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that an early Polish cyberpunk short story, "CyberJoly Drim" from 1998, aroused a significant controversy in the Polish science fiction and fantasy community? Source: https://ejournals.eu/pliki_artykulu_czasopisma/pelny_tekst/3d32c44d-af77-4c7d-9404-a10a190a3a2c/pobierz
Created by Piotrus (talk) and Asilvering (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 516 past nominations.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:49, 5 August 2024 (UTC).
- @Piotrus: You probably noticed by now I've rearranged the article so it's a bit more chronological. I've moved the publication dates out of the lead and into the body; these could probably cite the work itself but given what happened recently at Ácido Argentino I think it would be better if they were sourced. When this is done, I will review this.--Launchballer 11:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Should probably ping @Asilvering: just in case.--Launchballer 23:59, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Launchballer: I've added a cite to the single sentence which did not have it (after your c/e). Do let me know if anything else needs a cite. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Long enough, new enough. QPQ done and Earwig has no complaints. I see no reason why this might deserve a dispute tag. The hook is cited, interesting, and technically short enough, though is cruising for a pruning. If you're alright with the WP:DYKTRIMmed hook ALT0a: ... that the 1998 cyberpunk short story CyberJoly Drim caused a controversy in the Polish science fiction and fantasy community?, I'll approve this.--Launchballer 11:11, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Launchballer: Good catch, I fully agree the word "significant" was unnecessary, I am fine with ALT0a.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:18, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Let's roll.--Launchballer 09:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Launchballer: Good catch, I fully agree the word "significant" was unnecessary, I am fine with ALT0a.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:18, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Launchballer: I've added a cite to the single sentence which did not have it (after your c/e). Do let me know if anything else needs a cite. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Should probably ping @Asilvering: just in case.--Launchballer 23:59, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
