Talk:Cyclone Hamoon/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: OhHaiMark (talk · contribs) 13:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 02:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

On a cursory inspection, this article seems to be close to meeting the Good Article criteria already and is certainly a good read. I will start my review shortly. simongraham (talk) 02:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Comments

• Overall, the standard of the article is high.
• It is of substantial length, with 1,354 words of readable prose.
• The lead is appropriately long at 204 words.
• Authorship is 84.6% from the nominator with contributions from 19 other editors.
• It is currently assessed as a Stub class article but has seen extensive editing since being assessed on 24 October 2023, with a particularly significant edit on 9 September 2024.
• Although not a GA criteria, suggest adding ALT text for accessibility.
• Please remove duplicate links to Barisal District, Chittagongm, Cox's Bazar and Lakshmipur District.

Criteria

The six good article criteria:

1. It is reasonable well written.

   the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;

   • The writing is clear and appropriate.
   • Please rephrase "the disturbance had became a depression" to either "the disturbance had become a depression" or "the disturbance became a depression".
   • Suggest replacing "fishers" with "fishermen".
   • Suggest adding a comma after "803 shelters were opened".
   • I can see no other obvious spelling or grammar errors.

   it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.

   • Please check numbers conform to MOS:NUMERAL.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

   • A reference section is included, with sources listed.
   • Please add a trans-title in English for the Burmese title.

   all inline citations are from reliable sources;

   • Sources are a range of government information sources and contemporary newspapers. The latter are primary sources and so WP:PRIMARY applies.

   it contains no original research;

   • All relevant statements have inline citations.
   • Spot checks confirm both Hossain & Islam and the Regional Specialised Meteorological Centre articles seem to cover the topic. Statements appear backed up.

   it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism;

   • Earwig gives a 12.3% chance of copyright violation, which means that it is unlikely. The closest phrasing is with an article on the TBS website that includes the phrase "ships on the Lakshmipur-Bhola-Barishal route and ferries on the Lakshmipur-Bhola route".

3. It is broad in its coverage

   it addresses the main aspects of the topic.

   • The article covers main aspects of the storm and its impact.

   it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

   • The article goes into an appropriate level of detail.

4. It has a neutral point of view.

   it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.

   • The article seems balanced with a good information on the impact in different countries.

5. It is stable.

   it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.

   • There is no evidence of edit wars.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;

   • The images have appropriate PD tags, apart from the animation Hamoon 2023-10-23 2310Z-2023-10-24 0310Z.gif, which has a Japanese government CC tag.

   images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

   • The images are appropriate.

@OhHaiMark: Thank you for an interesting article. Please take a look at my comments above and ping me when you would like me to take another look. simongraham (talk) 02:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Done. How does it look now? OhHaiMark (talk) 15:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

@OhHaiMark: Excellent work. I have made a few minor amendments too. I believe that this article meets the criteria to be a Good Article.

Pass simongraham (talk) 23:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.