Welcome!

Hello, Simongraham, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (NBMR-1) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating NBMR-1, Simongraham!

Wikipedia editor Garagepunk66 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I enjoyed reading your article about the NBMR-1. Very well done.

To reply, leave a comment on Garagepunk66's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Simongraham. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Yotchiangrai

edit

Hi, I'm Robvanvee. Simongraham, thanks for creating Yotchiangrai!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article needs additional references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Robvanvee 18:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Parentheses in biological authorities

edit

Hi, the presence or absence of parentheses in biological authorities is meaningful; the parentheses around the author citation indicate that this was not the original taxonomic placement (as explained at Author citation (zoology)). So the parentheses need to be left precisely as they are in the source. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for adding the link to Wanda Wesołowska to some spider articles. If you do find authors for spider taxa not linked, you can check Wikipedia:WikiProject Spiders/List of Arachnologists, and do please add a name if it's not already there.

Personally, I see no reason not to spell Polish names correctly, so I would change "Wesolowska" to "Wesołowska". Peter coxhead (talk) 11:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please consider applying for Autopatrolled

edit

Hi, I've just patrolled an article you created. I only felt the need to add {{WPSpiders}}, a link to the relevant project on the talk page. Having had a look through some of your previous created articles it seems to me that you should apply for the Autopatrolled permission. It would help reduce the backlog at New Page Patrol if articles as good as the ones you've been creating weren't on the list. Regards, Cabayi (talk) 09:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ha, no need to apply, I just gave it to you. Cheers!--Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brancus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 25 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bedford S type
added a link pointing to Leyland
Muhammad Shah III Lashkari
added a link pointing to Orissa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Polish arachnologists

edit

Hi, I don't know if you are interested in creating articles on any of the other Polish arachnologists listed here, other than Wanda Wesołowska. I've just created a short article on Marek Żabka and am working on a draft for Joanna Gardzińska. One issue I've come across is that many Polish arachnologists have been involved with the Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, but this institution has had different names at different times (see pl:Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach). So I thought you might perhaps be interested in knowing this.

  • Wyższa Szkoła Nauczycielska (1969–1974)
  • Wyższa Szkoła Pedagogiczna (1974–1977)
  • Wyższa Szkoła Rolniczo-Pedagogiczna (1977–1999)
  • Akademia Podlaska (1999–2010)
  • Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny (from 2010)

I made a fix at Wanda Wesołowska based on one of these name changes. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for this, Peter. I have made start on an article on Barbara Maria Patoleta, who was supervised by Żabka and published with Gardzińska, based on the link. Please feel free to add to that too. Simongraham (talk) 21:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Great. I added Patoleta to Wikipedia:WikiProject Spiders/List of Arachnologists; this is useful as a source of wikitext for links. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barbara Maria Patoleta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMS Satyr (1916), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devonport. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Dashes

edit

Hi, MOS:DASHES requires either spaced en-dashes or unspaced em-dashes. One of the many Wikipedia style rules for new editors to learn! In taxon lists, spaced en-dash is normally used for information after the taxon and author. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. There seems to be a lot of inconsistency as some entries have hyphens, some en-dash and some em-dash across the different lists. I was attempting to introduce some consistency in the section but maybe there is a bigger edit available. Simongraham (talk) 19:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
Yes, there's a lot of inconsistency over dashes in many articles, not just spiders. It doesn't help that the differences don't show up clearly in some fonts. Peter coxhead (talk) 16:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 01:48, 27 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Simongraham. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Dear Simongraham,
do you own the book Bloomsbury Encyclopedia of Popular Music of the World, Volume 9, accidentally? I'm asking you because you corrected a formatting, using detailed info on the book. I'm particularly looking for its entry on Rapso.
Kind regards, Grueslayer 09:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of ship launches in 1917, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pembroke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Were the United States's submarines only active on the pacific front? Eddie891 Talk Work 20:01, 12 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

According to DANFS, there were some active in the Atlantic and Mediterranean including USS Blackfish, which sank the German Patrol Boat No. 408, and USS Herring, which sank the Ville du Havre, both as part of Operation Torch. Neither campaigns seem to be have been as important as the Pacific. Simongraham (talk) 10:14, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join WikiProject Military History

edit

Engine articles

edit

Great articles Simon. To make things easier for you and to help standardise aviation articles, you might like to use Template:WPAVIATION creator, it makes things so much easier, I personally use the cite tools on the toolbar for applying references, again it is so easy, especially if you have URLs or ISBN numbers.--Petebutt (talk) 08:21, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Simongraham. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Angelika Machinek

edit

Could explain why she meets WP:GNG or WP:BIO, or some other related notability guideline? I just don't see it. Please ping me (by entering {{ping|Arthur Rubin}} or {{u|Arthur Rubin}} if you reply on this page. You're on my watchlist, but perhaps not on a short-watchlist.) — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Arthur Rubin: Hi Arthur. Thank you for your interest. In terms of the WP:GNG criteria:

  • "Significant coverage" Dr Machinek is mentioned in multiple articles, both during her life and subsequently. The article references a biography and the popular press (in German).
  • "Reliable" The article includes references to articles in mainstream newspapers and the FAI website.
  • "Sources" The sources are all independent, with biographical detail confirmed from multiple sources. The literature is in German as there is a paucity of literature in English on German women's gliding (WP:NONENG).
  • "Independent of the subject" The article lists some of her publications but these are not used as source material. The Fund set up as a legacy to her was created after her death.
  • "Presumed" She is listed in multiple Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red categories and has a German wikipedia article, which demonstrates wider interest.

In terms of the WP:BIO criteria: "A sportsperson is presumed to be notable if the person has actively participated in a major amateur or professional competition or won a significant honor and so is likely to have received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." There are currently no specific criteria for gliding.

  • Dr Machinek is a five times national champion and has held nine world records. She won multiple inaugural races and has received an award from the international body that governs her sport. A fund was set up in her name as a legacy to support the future development of the sport. The article references the popular press and a biography, as well as the governing body.

Simongraham (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

The German Wikipedia article isn't linked. Could you give me a pointer? Never mind, I fixed it. The "other Wikipedias" section is now populated by Wikidata, so I fixed it.
At first glance, I can't determine whether gliding is a serious sport. Could you point me to some material (in the English language, preferably, although I probably qualify as reading level de-1.) See also quidditch, which is a real sport with an international governing board, but I don't believe we accept being a world-record-holder in that sport meets WP:NSPORT. My apologies if this should be obvious. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:48, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

edit

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the content guideline and the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 21:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

edit

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

HMS Rowena (1916)

edit

You added short references to Johnston 2009 and Colledge & Warlow 2010, those don't match the associated long reference. Could you verify if the years are correct please? Also, you should install User:Svick/HarvErrors.js to get noticed of such issues in articles when making use of short footnotes. If you don't know how to install that, let me know, I'll walk you through it. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:15, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Same for HMS Restless (1916) and possibly others. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:17, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
BTW, you don't need to add |ref=harv anymore. This works just fine now. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 11:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Here's another case where having Svick's script installed would have come in handy: [1]. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:05, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Article checklists

edit

Hi there,

As you may have gathered :), nearly everything in Wikipedia is negotiable - that includes what is, and what is not, required for B or even A class. Regardless of what other editors (me included) claim.

I write articles for users, so I try to keep them simple, provide graphics etc. I'm always trying to answer 'Why is this interesting to others?' That doesn't make me right - you have to find that balance for yourself.

One other thing; there's tons of information on the web, if you're curious enough. This article, for example, is one I did on Luis de Lacy; if you look at the Sources provided, all of those I found on the web. That's true of all my other articles.

Always happy to help if needed. Robinvp11 (talk) 18:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mendoza dersuuzalai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mendoza (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Oscar II

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Oscar II you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:00, 14 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Oscar II

edit

The article HSwMS Oscar II you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HSwMS Oscar II for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:21, 4 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Congrats on your first GA. Once you get the hang of it, it will be a much less painful process! May it be the first of many! Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:16, 4 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of HSwMS Oscar II

edit

  Hello! Your submission of HSwMS Oscar II at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Constantine 16:01, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Laurel (1913)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Laurel (1913) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 14:21, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Laurel (1913)

edit

The article HMS Laurel (1913) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Laurel (1913) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 10:41, 24 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Liberty (1913)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Liberty (1913) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 05:02, 31 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Liberty (1913)

edit

The article HMS Liberty (1913) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Liberty (1913) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 05:01, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Liberty (1913)

edit

The article HMS Liberty (1913) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Liberty (1913) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 22:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Japanese submarine I-5

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Japanese submarine I-5 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

There's a serious problem with the sourcing of the article; explanation on the review page.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:31, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

DYK for HSwMS Oscar II

edit

On 13 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article HSwMS Oscar II, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Swedish warship Oscar II (pictured), the first Swedish vessel named after the ruling monarch since 1824, was autographed by the king shortly after being commissioned in 1907? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/HSwMS Oscar II. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, HSwMS Oscar II), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Japanese submarine I-5

edit

The article Japanese submarine I-5 you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Japanese submarine I-5 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:41, 23 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Milk chocolate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cocoa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Congrats!

edit

G'day Simongraham, congrats on your first Milhist A-Class article. Essentially this means the article is quite to close to FA, and with some additional detail from sources mentioned by other reviewers, I suspect it would be a successful FAC nom. Good luck with it if that is what you decide to do. I will look out for it. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Linnet (1913)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Linnet (1913) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 03:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Linnet (1913)

edit

The article HMS Linnet (1913) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Linnet (1913) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 21:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Linnet (1913)

edit

The article HMS Linnet (1913) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Linnet (1913) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 01:22, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of AN/APS-20

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article AN/APS-20 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:43, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Italian nuclear weapons program

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian nuclear weapons program you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Italian nuclear weapons program

edit

The article Italian nuclear weapons program you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Italian nuclear weapons program for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Lysander (1913)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Lysander (1913) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 18:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Lysander (1913)

edit

The article HMS Lysander (1913) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Lysander (1913) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 20:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Lysander (1913)

edit

The article HMS Lysander (1913) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Lysander (1913) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of AN/APS-20

edit

The article AN/APS-20 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:AN/APS-20 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HMS Lysander (1913), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devonport.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Milk chocolate

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Milk chocolate you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 17:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Milk chocolate

edit

The article Milk chocolate you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Milk chocolate for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 17:21, 30 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Bditelnyy

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Bditelnyy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 23:21, 8 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Bditelnyy

edit

The article Soviet frigate Bditelnyy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Soviet frigate Bditelnyy for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 19:41, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Bditelnyy

edit

The article Soviet frigate Bditelnyy you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Bditelnyy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Milk chocolate

edit

The article Milk chocolate you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Milk chocolate for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 12:21, 15 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of AN/APS-20

edit

The article AN/APS-20 you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:AN/APS-20 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:41, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov

edit

The article Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov

edit

The article Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:41, 10 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Project Spaceflight!

edit
  The SPFLT Achievement Patch
For your GA reviews of SOLRAD 4 and SOLRAD 4B. Neopeius (talk) 15:19, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply


If working on those tempts you to join us working on 1960s space probes, I've got plenty of fun projects and cool people to introduce you to... ;) --Neopeius (talk) 15:19, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Some baklava for you!

edit
  I really appreciate your GA reviews, and I'm delighted that they sailed through. :) Always happy to return the favor. Neopeius (talk) 01:43, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SOGIN, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Casaccia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

User Page idea

edit

I notice you have several GAs. Why not use this template I added to your User Page for all your GAs as I have on my user page and make several top green icons                 on your user page as a start.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

I've added another top green icon to your User Page so you can get an idea how to do this. I recommend continuing and adding all your Good Articles now as top green icons. See my User Page as an example. Have fun.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Setter (1916)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Setter (1916) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Setter (1916)

edit

The article HMS Setter (1916) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Setter (1916) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:41, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Setter (1916)

edit

The article HMS Setter (1916) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Setter (1916) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 05:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Zadornyy

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Zadornyy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Constance Georgina Adams

edit

Hi. I was hoping you might name some plants she collected, particularly if they were type specimens. If they were type specimens, than someone may have named a plant for her. I don't have access to the books you used for your article, so I was hoping you might put in some additions....MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have also put her profile into Bionomia which is website where people attribute particular specimens to particular collectors. That is a hard task. But perhaps someone from one of the herbaria in which her specimens reside, may be interested? MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Llewellyn (1913)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Llewellyn (1913) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:01, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Zadornyy

edit

The article Soviet frigate Zadornyy you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Zadornyy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Llewellyn (1913)

edit

The article HMS Llewellyn (1913) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Llewellyn (1913) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Razumnyy

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Razumnyy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of SOGIN

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SOGIN you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 20:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Razumnyy

edit

The article Soviet frigate Razumnyy you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Razumnyy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:41, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Soviet frigate Zadornyy

edit

On 11 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Soviet frigate Zadornyy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Soviet frigate Zadornyy was named after the Russian word for "provocative"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Soviet frigate Zadornyy. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Soviet frigate Zadornyy), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Svirepyy

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Svirepyy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:01, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of SOGIN

edit

The article SOGIN you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:SOGIN for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 10:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Svirepyy

edit

The article Soviet frigate Svirepyy you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Svirepyy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:43, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

edit
Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
 
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
  • This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.

Click here to opt out of any future messages.

--Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Piaggio Stella P.IX

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Piaggio Stella P.IX you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Piaggio Stella P.IX

edit

The article Piaggio Stella P.IX you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Piaggio Stella P.IX for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Review

edit

Just wanted to say thanks for tackling Talk:Đakovo internment camp/GA1. If you have any suggestions for further improvement, I'd be happy to take them on. Best, Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 19:08, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Leyland Landtrain

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leyland Landtrain you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 12:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Leyland Landtrain

edit

The article Leyland Landtrain you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Leyland Landtrain for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 03:22, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA review of Hamilton, Baltimore

edit

Hello again. I'm sure I said this several times already, but I really appreciate your improvements to Hamilton, Baltimore. I wish I could send you a tip or something to repay you but I know that wouldn't be in the spirit of Wikipedia. :) Anyway, thanks for your time and effort. —Monarchjogs (talk) 01:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Savage (G20)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Savage (G20) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Savage (G20)

edit

The article HMS Savage (G20) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Savage (G20) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Savage (G20)

edit

The article HMS Savage (G20) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Savage (G20) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

HMS Obdurate (1916) has been nominated for Did You Know

edit

Hello, Simongraham. HMS Obdurate (1916), an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know . You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. EnterpriseyBot (talk!) 12:01, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Carel Victor Gerritsen

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carel Victor Gerritsen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Carel Victor Gerritsen

edit

The article Carel Victor Gerritsen you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Carel Victor Gerritsen for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Carel Victor Gerritsen

edit

The article Carel Victor Gerritsen you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Carel Victor Gerritsen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Multiple Good Article Reviewer's Barnstar
For your valued work in the July 2021 GAN Backlog Drive, which, in a single month, helped to reduce the backlog by nearly 50%. --Usernameunique (talk) 05:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

DYK for HMS Obdurate (1916)

edit

On 19 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article HMS Obdurate (1916), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that British M-class destroyers such as HMS Obdurate were built to counter German ships that did not exist? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Obdurate (1916). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, HMS Obdurate (1916)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ladjane Bandeira moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Ladjane Bandeira, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Agnihothri Sharath (talk) 01:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ladjane Bandeira moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Ladjane Bandeira, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Agnihothri Sharath (talk) 04:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Ladjane Bandeira has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ladjane Bandeira. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:28, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Razyashchiy

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Razyashchiy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Razyashchiy

edit

The article Soviet frigate Razyashchiy you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Razyashchiy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:41, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

WiG Editathon Barnstar

edit
  Women in Green GA Editathon — October '21
Thank you for your excellent contributions to Willy Corsari and Katia Bellillo during our first Women in Green editathon event! Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 15:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

December reviews

edit

It seems like your GAN for Urabe is listed for about a month and I have listed a GAN for Audrey Hepburn at the end of November. If you could do the review for the Audrey Hepburn article then I could offer to do the review for your nomination to try to move the articles forward. What do you think? ErnestKrause (talk) 01:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Kumeko Urabe

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kumeko Urabe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ErnestKrause -- ErnestKrause (talk) 19:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Kumeko Urabe

edit

The article Kumeko Urabe you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Kumeko Urabe for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ErnestKrause -- ErnestKrause (talk) 15:41, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year, Simongraham!

edit

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

edit
Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
 
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
  • On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.

Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages.

--Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Pytlivyy

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Pytlivyy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 04:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Moorsom (1914)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Moorsom (1914) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 02:21, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Moorsom (1914)

edit

The article HMS Moorsom (1914) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Moorsom (1914) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:02, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Pytlivyy

edit

The article Soviet frigate Pytlivyy you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Pytlivyy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 19:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Kumeko Urabe

edit

On 22 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kumeko Urabe, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that as well as having a film career spanning 60 years, Kumeko Urabe (pictured) became the oldest debut singer in 1984 with her single Octopus Song? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kumeko Urabe. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kumeko Urabe), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Writer's Barnstar
Thank you for writing Kumeko Urabe and many other good articles! Levivich 21:17, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Alexander

edit

Was Alexander (1807 ship) launched in 1800 or 1807? Asking as you created the article. Mjroots (talk) 18:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Asian Month 2021 Postcard

edit

Dear Participants,

Congratulations!

It's Wikipedia Asian Month's honor to have you all participated in Wikipedia Asian Month 2021, the seventh Wikipedia Asian Month. Your achievements were fabulous, and all the articles you created make the world can know more about Asia in different languages! Here we, the Wikipedia Asian Month International team, would like to say thank you for your contribution also cheer for you that you are eligible for the postcard of Wikipedia Asian Month 2021. Please kindly fill the form, let the postcard can send to you asap!

This form will be closed at March 15.

Cheers!

Thank you and best regards,

Wikipedia Asian Month International Team, 2022.02

The Dreadnought Project

edit

Dear Simon Graham. It would appear that since 2018 at the latest and up to the present time you have been copying fire control information from The Dreadnought Project and incorporating it into Wikipedia articles without attribution, whilst at the same time citing (often inaccurately and incompletely) our primary source references. This practice needs to stop. We don't mind our work being used on this website so long as it is properly attributed to The Dreadnought Project. Nor, for that matter, does WP:MILHIST. Regards, —Simon Harley (Talk | Library). 09:03, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Simon Harley: I am disappointed to have received this comment from a seasoned editor as I felt that your statements lacked the civility I would expect and did not assume good faith. Any inaccurate and incomplete referencing I have included is inadvertent or accidental, and, in my experience, quick to fix. Nobody has the right to act as though they are the owner of a particular article so please be bold and edit any article I have created. I hope you enjoy Wikipedia.

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For reviewing at least 15 points worth of articles during the January 2022 GAN Backlog Drive, I hereby present you with this barnstar in my capacity as coordinator. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:58, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

edit
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives.
Click here to opt out of any future messages.

(t · c) buidhe 04:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Women in Green - July GA Editathon

edit
 

Hello Simongraham:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in July 2022!

Running from July 1 to 31, 2022, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event focused on the topic of women and the environment. Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works during the event period (with an emphasis on environmental links and topics). GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk) 19:17, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Birayma Dyeme-Kumba moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Birayma Dyeme-Kumba, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dr vulpes (💬📝) 02:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

WiG Editathon Barnstar

edit
  Women in Green GA Editathon — July '22
Thank you for your excellent contributions as reviewer to articles Rita Miljo and Evdokia Reshetnik at the WiG "Women and the Environment" editathon event! All the best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 15:52, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

September drive bling

edit
  The Minor Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to Simongraham for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2022 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 19:34, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hymn to St Peter

edit

Thank you for the article! I made a few changes, please revert if you don't agree. I think the lead is a tad to detailed for a summary. Do you plan to take it to DYK? My last Britten piece there was Five Flower Songs. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Gerda Arendt: Thank you for your changes. I feel they really improve the article. Please do more and submit it for DYK if you have the time.

Postwar Stalin bluewater operations

edit

I've just stumbled across this book which might be useful if you want to do anymore post-war Soviet ships: Watson, Bruce. Red Navy At Sea: Soviet Naval Operations On The High Seas, 1956-1980. And should be consulted before sending your latest to FAC. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Maenad (1915)

edit

The article HMS Maenad (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Maenad (1915) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Maenad (1915)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thehistorianisaac -- Thehistorianisaac (talk) 10:04, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Maenad (1915)

edit

The article HMS Maenad (1915) you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:HMS Maenad (1915) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thehistorianisaac -- Thehistorianisaac (talk) 10:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Mike Christie, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:38, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Maenad (1915)

edit

The article HMS Maenad (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Maenad (1915) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Maenad (1915)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thehistorianisaac -- Thehistorianisaac (talk) 03:02, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Mystic (1915)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Mystic (1915) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 01:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wrong Sydney award

edit

It looks like you referred to the wrong Sydney here - east bound Atlantic convoys assembled at Sydney, Nova Scotia in both World Wars. At least you didn't buy an airline ticket to the wrong Sydney!Nigel Ish (talk) 10:16, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev

edit

The article Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev for comments about the article, and Talk:Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Juan López Mella

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Juan López Mella you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 19:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Juan López Mella

edit

The article Juan López Mella you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Juan López Mella and Talk:Juan López Mella/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 04:40, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Juan López Mella

edit

The article Juan López Mella you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Juan López Mella for comments about the article, and Talk:Juan López Mella/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 10:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Mystic (1915)

edit

The article HMS Mystic (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Mystic (1915) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Mystic (1915)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 19:41, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Marne (1915)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Marne (1915) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 01:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar

edit
  The Invisible Barnstar
For reviewing 4 nominations for a total of 4 points during the June 2022 GAN Backlog Drive, I hereby award you this barnstar. Congratulations! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev

edit

On 21 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev was ordered to sail on 24 December 1976, but its crew refused to comply, causing the removal of its senior officers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hook update
Your hook reached 9,503 views (791.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Myngs (1914)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Myngs (1914) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 05:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Juan López Mella

edit

On 30 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Juan López Mella, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1991, Juan López Mella was the first Spanish rider to achieve a podium place in the Superbike World Championship? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Juan López Mella. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Juan López Mella), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Sturdy (1919)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Sturdy (1919) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:42, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment

edit

You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Myngs (1914)

edit

The article HMS Myngs (1914) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Myngs (1914) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Myngs (1914)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 02:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Sturdy (1919)

edit

The article HMS Sturdy (1919) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Sturdy (1919) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Sturdy (1919)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA review for Hummingbird

edit

Hello Simon - your work in guiding Sword-billed hummingbird to GA is much appreciated, as it appears to be the only hummingbird article with this standing. Could you please browse the Hummingbird article for its candidacy as a GA?

If you feel the hummingbird article is worthwhile, please also consider working with me and other editors as the reviewer to bring it to GA. Many thanks. Zefr (talk) 22:52, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Staunch (1910)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Staunch (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please note that I've made my comments--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations from the Military History Project

edit
  Military history reviewers' award
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between October and December 2022. Hawkeye7 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 04:16, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Your GA nomination of HMS Staunch (1910)

edit

The article HMS Staunch (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Staunch (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Staunch (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Wanda Wesołowska

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wanda Wesołowska you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations from the Military History Project

edit
  Military history reviewers' award
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between January and March 2023. Hawkeye7 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 19:46, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Your GA nomination of HMS Martin (1910)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Martin (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:24, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Wanda Wesołowska

edit

The article Wanda Wesołowska you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wanda Wesołowska and Talk:Wanda Wesołowska/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 07:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Martin (1910)

edit

The article HMS Martin (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Martin (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Martin (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Wanda Wesołowska

edit

The article Wanda Wesołowska you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Wanda Wesołowska for comments about the article, and Talk:Wanda Wesołowska/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 06:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Stenaelurillus guttiger

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stenaelurillus guttiger you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 20:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Stenaelurillus guttiger

edit

The article Stenaelurillus guttiger you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stenaelurillus guttiger and Talk:Stenaelurillus guttiger/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 19:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Stenaelurillus guttiger

edit

The article Stenaelurillus guttiger you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Stenaelurillus guttiger for comments about the article, and Talk:Stenaelurillus guttiger/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 19:43, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Maurice Suckling

edit

Hi, you were kind enough to do an image review for Maurice Suckling when the article was first up for ACR. My absence from the site led that nomination to be archived, but it's back now and I wondered whether you'd be willing to reiterate your support, considering the images have not changed? Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for HMS Martin (1910)

edit

On 30 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article HMS Martin (1910), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that HMS Martin was part of the Grand Fleet of the Royal Navy in the First World War, but after the war was sold to be broken up? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Martin (1910). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, HMS Martin (1910)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Wanda Wesołowska

edit

On 3 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wanda Wesołowska, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Wanda Wesołowska has named 40 genera and 572 species of animals? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wanda Wesołowska. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Wanda Wesołowska), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations from the Military History Project

edit
  The Military history A-Class medal
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the A-Class medal for HSwMS Oscar II, Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov, and Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev. Gog the Mild (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Penn (1916)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Penn (1916) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Ruby (1910)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Ruby (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:00, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2023 Military History Project Contest Entries

edit

I have checked and confirmed five of your entries. I have taken the initiative to delete what appears to be a duplicate Talk:Wattignies-class cruiser entry. I have not confirmed Fleurus because the talk page shows it unrated as of this time. I have not confirmed Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev because I read the talk page to show a change from GA to A, 15 points, rather than B to A, 18 points. If I have made any mistakes in this review, please let me know so that I can change or add an assessment as necessary. If I am slow to respond, a closing coordinator may correct any mistake that I have made or you may wish to ask a co-ordinator to check on it if the mistake is not first reverted by another reviewer or the closing coordinator. Thanks for all your hard work on these articles. Donner60 (talk) 07:21, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Donner60: I think you are correct in all these so have amended the entries. Thank you for all your work on this contest. I have only just found it but it looks quite inspiring. simongraham 05:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I have not had a contest entry yet but I may have one or more in the future. I thought I could help the project in a small way by checking the entries so that those entering the contest would not have to take that on as well. I have worked on several articles recently and have a few in draft but the work has been mainly small or offline and not yet posted. I have not written any new articles for a few years, however. I was right to be cautious by suggesting checking my review. I obviously made an error in the number of points for Vasily Chapayev by not reading the scoring table carefully enough for that one. Thanks for correcting that. Donner60 (talk) 08:19, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

HMS Fury (1911) contest entry

edit

The talk page shows that the assessment for this article was on May 1. I think this can be properly entered into the May Military History Project contest. You may wish to double check with a coordinator if my opinion appears to be mistaken or to reject the suggestion if you are aware that it is in fact mistaken. Donner60 (talk) 07:38, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Donner60: Happy to make the change. simongraham 05:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Penn (1916)

edit

The article HMS Penn (1916) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Penn (1916) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Penn (1916)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:24, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Munster

edit

The article HMS Munster you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Munster for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Munster/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jack4576 -- Jack4576 (talk) 13:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Ruby (1910)

edit

The article HMS Ruby (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Ruby (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Ruby (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations - May 2023 MilHist Article Writing Contest

edit
  The WikiChevrons
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, I (belatedly) hereby award you the WikiChevrons for placing first in the May 2023 Military History Article Writing Contest, achieving 43 points from 7 articles. Congratulations! Zawed (talk) 08:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations - June 2023 MilHist Article Writing Contest

edit
  The WikiChevrons
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, I (in a much more timely manner) hereby award you the WikiChevrons for placing first in the June 2023 Military History Article Writing Contest, achieving 60 points from 10 articles. Another fantastic effort! Zawed (talk) 08:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Scout (1918)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Scout (1918) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:20, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Milbrook (1915)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Milbrook (1915) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 11:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Milbrook (1915)

edit

The article HMS Milbrook (1915) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Milbrook (1915) and Talk:HMS Milbrook (1915)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 11:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Scout (1918)

edit

The article HMS Scout (1918) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Scout (1918) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Scout (1918)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:41, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Milbrook (1915)

edit

The article HMS Milbrook (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Milbrook (1915) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Milbrook (1915)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Lookout (1914)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Lookout (1914) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Searcher (1918)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Searcher (1918) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Searcher (1918)

edit

The article HMS Searcher (1918) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Searcher (1918) and Talk:HMS Searcher (1918)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 09:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

WiG Editathon Barnstar

edit
  Women in Green Editathon June '23
Thank you for your excellent contributions to the GA review for Ida Mett at the latest WiG Wildcard Edition editathon!

Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 23:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Searcher (1918)

edit

The article HMS Searcher (1918) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Searcher (1918) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Searcher (1918)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:23, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Lookout (1914)

edit

The article HMS Lookout (1914) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Lookout (1914) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Lookout (1914)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

edit
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
 
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Tapperheten (1901)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Tapperheten (1901) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:42, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

July 2023 Military History Writing Contest

edit
  The WikiChevrons
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, I hereby award you the WikiChevrons, for placing first in the July 2023 Military History Article Writing Contest, achieving 68 points from 11 articles. Congratulations, Hog Farm Talk 22:43, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nasta Rojc

edit

I admit I am not remotely technical, but I never got a formal bot notice that the GA had passed and the page still shows it is being reviewed? Sorry to trouble you. For the record, I did research Alexandrina Onslow, but on my side of the pond I could not find enough to write about her. I know she must have had a fascinating life. Both parents died by 1881, raised by her aunt, Udea Onslow (weird that her dad is sort of crossed out), Udea died in 1883, her husband Astley Thompson died in 1887 and rest of the family moved to Australia. It seems likely to me that she joined them there because her military records show her first service was in a hospital corps for the Australian diaspora. In 1911 (aged 46] she was living at the Crofton Grange School run by Mary Alice Lyster. How she came to own a yacht, join the Scottish Women's Hospitals, etc. is all a mystery. obit 15 Feb 1950 SusunW (talk) 16:53, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Italian frigate Alpino (F 580)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian frigate Alpino (F 580) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Tapperheten (1901)

edit

The article HSwMS Tapperheten (1901) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HSwMS Tapperheten (1901) for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Tapperheten (1901)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:22, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Tourmaline (1875)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Tourmaline (1875) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 13:24, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Tourmaline (1875)

edit

The article HMS Tourmaline (1875) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Tourmaline (1875) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Tourmaline (1875)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 04:00, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Italian frigate Alpino (F 580)

edit

The article Italian frigate Alpino (F 580) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Italian frigate Alpino (F 580) and Talk:Italian frigate Alpino (F 580)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Italian frigate Alpino (F 580)

edit

The article Italian frigate Alpino (F 580) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Italian frigate Alpino (F 580) for comments about the article, and Talk:Italian frigate Alpino (F 580)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

HSwMS Tapperheten (1901)

edit

I have confirmed your recent contest entries except for the captioned one. My opinion is that you should be able to claim "none" for the start rating. That is based on the sequence of ratings: no ratings, you ask for GA, WP Ships rates as B but WP Ships is not a task force of the Military History Project, Military History Bot rates C while GA is on review, then GA is approved for the Military History Project rating. I am sure the WP Ships rating does not apply for the contest. I also think the Bot rating that comes after the GA request should not apply for the contest. I have seen at least one other such rating recently and gave an opinion that since the GA request was made before the bot rating, the Military History Project class rating at the time the GA request was made should be used as the entry rating for the contest. Since this sequence of assessments appears likely to occur from time to time, I have asked for confirmation of my opinion on the Military History co-ordinators talk page and have pinged you about that posting. Donner60 (talk) 03:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

If I had been paying full attention to this, I would have seen that you had already claimed the lower rating in July. Sturmvogel66 has now confirmed the August rating. He is more experienced in the contest and I will not disturb his rating and I do not see a reason to pose a question about it. In total you are getting the full credit for your improvements which was my intended starting point. It also appears I did not pose the exact scenario on the co-ordinator talk page but I have been given some guidance for similar situations. I am glad Sturmvogel66 stepped up and handled this. Sorry for the bother. I have had a few learning experiences with confirmations. As long as I continue to do them, and get them right eventually, it is good to have some guidance about entries which do not seem to be covered specifically by the contest rules. Thanks for your numerous great contributions to the project. Donner60 (talk) 07:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Epsom riot has an RFC

edit
 

Talk:Epsom riot has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Polyamorph (talk) 13:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Mansfield (1914)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Mansfield (1914) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 04:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for participating in the August 2023 GAN backlog drive

edit
  The Reviewer Barnstar
We really appreciate that you reviewed several GANs during the drive. Due in part to your efforts, the backlog of unreviewed nominations was reduced by 440 articles, an astonishing 69 percent.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:09, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Contest?

edit

Hello, I noticed you've been working a lot on Tree of Life related articles in the past month; maybe you'd like to note your contributions at the Tree of Life Contest? AryKun (talk) 15:30, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@AryKun: Thank you. That looks really interesting. I will see what I can do to sign up. simongraham (talk) 04:56, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Saladin (1919)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Saladin (1919) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Mansfield (1914)

edit

The article HMS Mansfield (1914) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Mansfield (1914) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Mansfield (1914)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 08:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Saladin (1919)

edit

The article HMS Saladin (1919) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Saladin (1919) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Saladin (1919)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:20, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Tree of Life Contest

edit
  Barn Owl Barnstar
It gives me great pleasure to award you this barnstar for winning the inaugural edition of the WikiProject Tree of Life Monthly Contest! Great work improving all of those articles on spiders from less studied parts of the world, especially improving them to be pretty comprehensive instead of a bare start; it is much appreciated. AryKun (talk) 14:53, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations from the Military History Project

edit
  Military history reviewers' award
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 3 reviews between April and June 2023. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 06:07, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Congratulations from the Military History Project

edit
  Military history reviewers' award
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 2 reviews between July and September 2023. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 06:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

HSwMS Manligheten

edit

After the alterations, the hull was 90.2 m (296 ft) long at the waterline and 35 tonnes (34 long tons) tonnes in displacement.

It may be strong opinion, but I dont think that is possible. Something is missing there. PMG (talk) 15:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Pylades (1854)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Pylades (1854) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reminder

edit

Hey, just wanted to remind you to note your contributions at the ToL Contest if you want to, since I noticed you haven't yet. AryKun (talk) 08:18, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Pylades (1854)

edit

The article HMS Pylades (1854) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Pylades (1854) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Pylades (1854)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Nemesis (1910)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Nemesis (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 21:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Nemesis (1910)

edit

The article HMS Nemesis (1910) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Nemesis (1910) and Talk:HMS Nemesis (1910)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 22:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023 Military History Writing Contest

edit
  The Writers Barnstar
On behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I am pleased to reward your sterling performance - 5 articles and 35 points - and second place finish in October with this award of the Writers Barnstar. Congratulations, Donner60 (talk) 03:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Nemesis (1910)

edit

The article HMS Nemesis (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Nemesis (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Nemesis (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 05:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Editor experience invitation

edit

Hi Simongraham :) I'm looking to interview people here, feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:05, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Minion (1915)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Minion (1915) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 11:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Minion (1915)

edit

The article HMS Minion (1915) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Minion (1915) and Talk:HMS Minion (1915)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 12:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Seasons Greetings!

edit

Your GA nomination of HMS Minion (1915)

edit

The article HMS Minion (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Minion (1915) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Minion (1915)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 11:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Mosquito (1910)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Mosquito (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 22:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Sirdar (1918)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Sirdar (1918) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:03, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Tree of Life Contest

edit
  Barn Owl Barnstar
Congratulations on winning the December Tree of Life Monthly Contest! Very impressive work and much appreciated by everyone who likes learning about spiders on this site. AryKun (talk) 10:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tree of Life Contest, again

edit
  The Tree of Life Barnstar
Amazing work on Tree of Life articles this year; thanks for consistently writing high-quality articles throughout the year. You are the winner of the 2023 Tree of Life Contest! AryKun (talk) 10:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

New page reviewer granted

edit
 

Hi Simongraham. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
  • Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
  • Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. signed, Rosguill talk 23:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Mosquito (1910)

edit

The article HMS Mosquito (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Mosquito (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Mosquito (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 03:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Sirdar (1918)

edit

The article HMS Sirdar (1918) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Sirdar (1918) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Sirdar (1918)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Racoon (1910)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Racoon (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Menemerus animatus

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Menemerus animatus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 17:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Menemerus animatus

edit

The article Menemerus animatus you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Menemerus animatus for comments about the article, and Talk:Menemerus animatus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 21:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

HSwMS Äran

edit

Working to add at least one reference to the MilHist unreferenced articles, I copied the design and development para from your HSwMS Tapperheten article over to Äran. Unless there are significant differences between the sisters, all you need to do is work on its career for an easy GA. Just let me know whenever you do that and I'll do the review. Speaking of those, I'll respond your changes on Racoon later today. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Äran

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Äran you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Rattlesnake (1910)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Rattlesnake (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Racoon (1910)

edit

The article HMS Racoon (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Racoon (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Racoon (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations - January 2024 MilHist Article Writing Contest

edit
  The WikiChevrons
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, I hereby award you the WikiChevrons for placing first in the January 2024 Military History Article Writing Contest, achieving 33 points from 3 articles, all started at GA class. Well done. Donner60 (talk) 01:30, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Äran

edit

The article HSwMS Äran you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HSwMS Äran for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Äran/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd

edit

The article Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd for comments about the article, and Talk:Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

edit
  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
This award is given in recognition to Simongraham for collecting at least 25 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Wasa (1901)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Wasa (1901) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Rattlesnake (1910)

edit

The article HMS Rattlesnake (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Rattlesnake (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Rattlesnake (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Afraflacilla braunsi

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Afraflacilla braunsi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 22:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Afraflacilla braunsi

edit

The article Afraflacilla braunsi you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Afraflacilla braunsi for comments about the article, and Talk:Afraflacilla braunsi/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 16:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Clas Fleming

edit

I've finished with everything I could find on the ship. Harris, my primary source, is self-contradictory in places so feel free to change whatever doesn't match your Swedish sources. And you want to change my cites to sfn or whatever, I'm OK with that. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Do you read Swedish yourself or do you use a translation program? I ask because I was building a topic box of all the Swedish DDs and found more than a few Swedish-language titles of interest. Some of these are not readily available from libraries like Jagare: med Svenska flottans jagare under 80 år, but are available for not too much money. The article on HSwMS Nordenskjöld has other books that look to be helpful for our little project.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Sturmvogel 66: That does look a useful list. Thank you. Good luck tracking them down. It does take me a bit of time to process the text as I have more experience of Norwegian than Swedish, but non-English sources can provide valuable insights lacking in the English literature so I feel it is worth it. I find translation programs helpful, particularly for languages I have less experience of like Polish, but I am wary of trusting in them alone. simongraham (talk) 01:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, my French isn't very good, but it's good enough to validate/correct the translation programs.
The editor who did Nordenskjöld had done a bunch of other DDs as well. They all need some work, including a proper description, but could pretty easily be cleaned up for a GAN. I dunno how much your readily available Swedish sources can add, but it might be worth inviting him to our little scheme since he has access to books that neither one of us have. No reason why we can't have triple nominators, after all. What do you think?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 10:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sounds reasonable. simongraham (talk) 12:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Wasa (1901)

edit

The article HSwMS Wasa (1901) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HSwMS Wasa (1901) for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Wasa (1901)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

edit
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
 
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

HSwMS Wrangel (25)

edit

I've added everything I could and rewritten the article. Hopefully you can dig up more from your Swedish sources; the info on her activities is far sparser than I'd prefer. Even a general statement that she did neutrality patrols and convoy escort missions during the war would be better than what's there now.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Sturmvogel 66: There is not much in the literature I have access to either but I have added a couple of newspaper reports. simongraham (talk)

A citation barnstar for you

edit
  The Citation Barnstar
For good work during WP: FEB24 drive! Davidindia (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations - February 2024 MilHist Article Writing Contest

edit
  The WikiChevrons
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, I hereby award you the WikiChevrons for placing first in the February 2024 Military History Article Writing Contest, achieving 27 points from 3 articles, 1 promoted to and 2 started at GA class. Well done. Donner60 (talk) 05:40, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

edit
 

Citation Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to Simongraham for collecting more than 200 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:48, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Phintella parva

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Phintella parva you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Manligheten

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Manligheten you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Manligheten

edit

The article HSwMS Manligheten you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HSwMS Manligheten and Talk:HSwMS Manligheten/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Still a couple of quibbles to deal with.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lake Chad

edit

Hello, I just corrected some obvious issues you pointed out, but I still have a few questions. I hope you can answer them:


1. I think Leblanc et al 2006 still have value in being used in this article, as the research is based on geological evidence. Do you think the problem can be solved by reducing the length of relevant paragraphs?

I agree that Leclanc et al 2006 is very useful. I suggest seeing if there are other writings that can be added for balance rather than reducing the content that is there currently.

2. I think the relevant parts of the Ancient Rome can be directly deleted or summarized more concisely with other sources. I don't know how you think about this issue?

That seems reasonable. If there are no sources for the statements they should be replaced by something that is reliably sourced.

3. You pointed out potential copyright issues, does this mean that I should reduce some content based on the Encyclopedia Britannica? I have already made some reduce. Do you think I should continue to reduce the length of related content?

Excellent work; Earwig now gives a 23.7% similarity, which is a substantial improvement.

4. You have provided many supplementary sources, thank you very much. I will use these sources to further improve. However, you mentioned that the article lacks a description of the history of pre European periods. But I completely do not understand Hausa language. Would you be willing to provide some sources?

I am really glad to be of help. There are plenty on the various Hausa Kingdoms in the area and the Kanem–Bornu Empire in English too. A relatively recent book on the Empire is A History of Borno: Trans-Saharan African Empire to Failing Nigerian State[[2]]. Lange's Ancient Kingdoms of West Africa[[3]] may also be useful, not least because the studies in its tend to be more Africa-centric than many other sources. Saulawa's 2016 paper on Leo Africanus[[4]] may also be helpful.

Thank you very much for your help. Newbamboo (talk) 13:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Newbamboo: Thank you for your work on this. Answers above. I suggest we continue this discussion on the GA review talk page. simongraham (talk) 18:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
May I ask if you can check now? Thank you. Newbamboo (talk) 23:52, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have completed it. Do you have any other comments? Thank you. Newbamboo (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Plexippoides regius

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Plexippoides regius you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 01:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

3 volume history of the Swedish Navy

edit

I found links to pdf of the above at User:Saftgurka's home page. Hopefully there's some stuff there about the wartime activities of the various ships as well as background info on procurement decisions in volume III. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 10:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Plexippoides regius

edit

The article Plexippoides regius you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Plexippoides regius for comments about the article, and Talk:Plexippoides regius/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 23:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Manligheten

edit

The article HSwMS Manligheten you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HSwMS Manligheten for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Manligheten/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Niord

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Niord you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

edit

Hello Simongraham,

 
New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

 

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Supermarine Spiteful GAN

edit

Hi there, I have now acquired a copy of Morgan and Shacklady, which has a whole chapter on the Spiteful that I have not had access to before, and I would like to expand the article using this resource. Also, a couple of editors have recently done work on the article without discussing it on the talk or review pages first. As both of these issues imo make the article/nomination rather unstable, I would like a week before checking their work and adding more myself. Is that OK? Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 11:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Amitchell125: That seems very reasonable. I look forward to seeing your enhancements to the article. simongraham (talk) 13:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Oden

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Oden you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 21:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Spiteful

edit

Hi, I now think I have gone as far as I can with the article, apologies for the delay. Amitchell125 (talk) 11:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Excellent work. This is now a GA. simongraham (talk)

Your GA nomination of HMS Renard (1909)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Renard (1909) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Niord

edit

The article HSwMS Niord you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HSwMS Niord for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Niord/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

GAN backlog drive barnstar

edit
  The Reviewer Barnstar
Thank you for participating in the March 2024 backlog drive. Your contribution (12 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 250 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation.

asilvering (talk) 21:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

edit
New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Oden

edit

The article HSwMS Oden you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HSwMS Oden for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Oden/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 11:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Tetrarch (1917)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Tetrarch (1917) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Tetrarch (1917)

edit

The article HMS Tetrarch (1917) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Tetrarch (1917) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Tetrarch (1917)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tree of Life Contest entries

edit

Hey Simon, I just wanted to let you know that I've removed several of your entries for this month at the TOL Contest. You worked on those articles from January to March, so they aren't eligible for points this month. Thanks, AryKun (talk) 01:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@AryKun: I noticed. How would you like an entrant to count an article that is improved one month but not reassessed until a subsequent month please? That is particularly common for articles nominated for GA but may also occur in other cases. Incidentally, my name is simongraham; you are not the first to assume. simongraham (talk) 05:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
For GAs and FAs, it’s fine to use the month in which they pass for the points, since these are processes that involve external reviews that can take time. For anything up to B-class, you can usually just change the rating yourself and add it in the month in which you did most of the work on the article. This is a monthly contest, so if you forget to claim points on some articles in a particular month, you can’t really carry them forward and claim them later. AryKun (talk) 16:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. It is good to know what your preference is. simongraham (talk)

April 24 Military History Writing Contest

edit
  The Writers Barnstar
On behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I am pleased to reward your sterling performance - 3 articles, all started at GA and 33 points - and second place finish in the Military History Project writing contest with this award of the Writers Barnstar. Congratulations, Donner60 (talk) 03:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Basilisk (1910)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Basilisk (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Evarcha maculata

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Evarcha maculata you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Basilisk (1910)

edit

The article HMS Basilisk (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Basilisk (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Basilisk (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Renard (1909)

edit

The article HMS Renard (1909) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Renard (1909) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Renard (1909)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Menace (1915)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Menace (1915) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Evarcha maculata

edit

The article Evarcha maculata you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Evarcha maculata for comments about the article, and Talk:Evarcha maculata/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 17:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations - May 2024 Military History Writing Contest

edit
  The Writers Barnstar
On behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I am pleased to reward your sterling performance - 3 articles, 2 started at GA and 1 started at B class, 28 points - and second place finish in the Military History Project writing contest with this award of the Writers Barnstar. Congratulations, Donner60 (talk) 07:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Evarcha praeclara

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Evarcha praeclara you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Relativity -- Relativity (talk) 02:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

edit
  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
This award is given in recognition to Simongraham for accumulating at least 25 points during the May 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 14,452 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to participate in WP:GARC

edit
 

Hello Simongraham, I noticed you have an article listed at WP:GAN. I recently started a project, Good Article Review Circles, and thought you might be interested. This initiative helps articles get reviewed more quickly through collaborative efforts. By joining, you'll review others' articles and get your own reviewed in return. Check out the page for more details!GMH Melbourne (talk) 09:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Phintella parva

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Phintella parva you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wolverine XI -- Wolverine XI (talk) 10:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Phintella parva

edit

The article Phintella parva you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Phintella parva for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wolverine XI -- Wolverine XI (talk) 13:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Evarcha praeclara

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Evarcha praeclara you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Relativity -- Relativity (talk) 20:41, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Menace (1915)

edit

The article HMS Menace (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Menace (1915) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Menace (1915)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Contest entry HMS Menace (1915)

edit

I have checked the contest entry for this article which was entered as none > GA. However, the article had been rated B class by a rater, not a bot, in an earlier month. The bot carried it forward but User:Rfl0216 had rated it B class for military history and ships. It appears this should be entered as B > GA. Have I missed something here or should this be changed to B > GA? Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 06:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Donner60: The article has not been entered in the competition before as the goal was to edit it until it was promoted to GA but I have no preference so please do change it if that works for you. simongraham (talk) 00:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
After entering a confused note about bot reviews here, it occurred to me that you actually had clarified that the article had been entered in the contest earlier. So I checked that and it means that the current contest entry should start as B class. Sorry for my overall confusion; and I hope you did not waste time with my previous note which I have just removed several minutes after posting it. Donner60 (talk) 02:19, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Donner60: Thank you. In trying to clarify, I mistyped and so may have achieved the opposite. The article has not been entered before. Sorry for the confusion. simongraham (talk) 16:26, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the DCWC!

edit
 
See a    "developing" or    "least developed" country? Write about it to earn points!

Welcome to the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest, Simongraham! The contest is now open for submissions. List your work at your submissions page to earn points. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

  • Got open nominations? List them at review requests.
  • Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews.
  • Not sure if your article qualifies? See the guidelines for more information or contact a coordinator for verification.
  • New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions about the contest on the talk page.
  • Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open until 15 July, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you good luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!

edit
 
Thanks for participating in the June 2024 backlog drive!

You scored 300 points while adding citations to articles during WikiProject Reliability's first {{citation needed}} backlog drive, earning you this citation barnstar. Thanks for helping out!

Pichpich (talk) 16:02, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

DCWC submission declined

edit

hello! i've declined your submission of Suleiman of Germiyan for DYK points, as DYK reviews are not eligible, only the expansion & nominations themselves. thank you for participating, and if you have any questions let me know. :) ... sawyer * he/they * talk 21:21, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Evarcha praeclara

edit

The article Evarcha praeclara you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Evarcha praeclara for comments about the article, and Talk:Evarcha praeclara/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Relativity -- Relativity (talk) 15:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

DCWC August update

edit

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for a month, and we've already seen some momentous improvement in the quality of many articles about underrepresented subjects! So far, our top-scoring participants are:

Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier! The coordinators would like to extend a special thanks to   Thebiguglyalien (submissions) for his commitment to keeping these review pages up to date.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations - July 2024 Military History Writing Contest

edit
  The Writers Barnstar
On behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I am pleased to reward your sterling performance - 2 articles, 1 brought to A class, 16 points - and second place finish in the July Military History Project writing contest with this award of the Writers Barnstar. Congratulations, Donner60 (talk) 00:27, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Milk chocolate

edit

Hi simongraham, I'm doing some work on chocolate articles, and I was hoping to get some help after seeing your work on milk chocolate. I can't track down the 2019 update for Fromm, I can only see the 2016 edition. I also thought you might like to see corrections to the etymology listed on Chocolate#Etymology. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 00:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Evarcha michailovi

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Evarcha michailovi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 19:24, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Evarcha michailovi

edit

The article Evarcha michailovi you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Evarcha michailovi for comments about the article, and Talk:Evarcha michailovi/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 19:43, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Vladivostok

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet cruiser Vladivostok you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Stivushka -- Stivushka (talk) 07:42, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Vladivostok

edit

The article Soviet cruiser Vladivostok you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Soviet cruiser Vladivostok for comments about the article, and Talk:Soviet cruiser Vladivostok/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Stivushka -- Stivushka (talk) 10:21, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for participating in the July 2024 GAN backlog drive

edit
  The Reviewer Barnstar
Your noteworthy contribution (14.5 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 160 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 12:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

edit
New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Points for Vladivostok for the MilHist Contest

edit

Sorry to be Debbie Downer, but the work you did on the article back in 2020 got it up to B class. Your recent work got it up to GA and the difference between them when you nominated it are how you count the points for the contest. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Lictor mirabilis

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lictor mirabilis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 22:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Evarcha striolata

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Evarcha striolata you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 22:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

French ironclad Valmy

edit

I have changed the assessment for this article from the bot assessment of C class to B class. I changed the contest entry accordingly. My reviewed showed that one paragraph had no references when the bot asssessed it but that you had subsequently added a reference for that paragraph. I see no other reason to prevent the B assessment. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 02:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Peruvian cruiser Lima contest entry

edit

The bot assessment was posted just after midnight on September 1 so the August contest entry was not assessed during August. I did note that you made an edit, albeit a copy edit, after midnight for what it might be worth in the analysis. (I think that suggests the article itself may be considered completed for assessment in September.) Peacemaker67 agreed with my conclusion that this entry belongs entirely in the September contest. So the start of the month rating will be "none" and the end of the month will be B or GA if the GA assessment is done by that time, which I suspect it should be. In the unlikely event anyone asks about this, please refer them to this post. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 22:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

DCWC September update

edit

The Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for two months, and we've seen tremendous improvement in the encyclopedic coverage of several underrepresented areas from a wide range of editors! The coordinators would like to highlght some of the newer faces who have been making notable contributions in the contest, including but by no means limited to:

Only one month remains until the end of the contest, so it's time to make your remaining nominations! Please consider answering some review requests, particularly the older entries, as a way of helping out your fellow participants and moving up the leaderboard. Good luck!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Lictor mirabilis

edit

The article Lictor mirabilis you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Lictor mirabilis for comments about the article, and Talk:Lictor mirabilis/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 12:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Ndiadiane Ndiaye

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ndiadiane Ndiaye you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Freedom4U -- Freedom4U (talk) 00:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Peruvian cruiser Lima

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Peruvian cruiser Lima you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Detalik

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Detalik you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 18:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

DCWC submission declined

edit

Thanks for your contributions in the Developing Countries WikiContest! I've had to decline your submission of Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of parliamentary constituencies of Nepal/archive1 as it is unfortunately too short to award points for. Please see the relevant section of the scoring rules for more information. However, it looks like the candidate has not yet received a substantial source review, so I discussed it with another coordinator and we agreed that your submission could be accepted if you conducted one. I hope you'll consider that, and please let me or another coordinator know if you have any questions! ... sawyer * he/they * talk 19:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

GOCE copy-edit of Federal Republic of Central America

edit

Hi Simongraham, i noticed you accepted at copy-edit request for the above article at the Guild of Copy Editors Requests page but you haven't yet started working on the article. If you still intend to copy-edit it, please let us know at the Requests page, otherwise a coordinator will strike your acceptance so another editor can take the request. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 22:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi again, Simongraham. Are you still planning to copy-edit this article? I see you've only made on edit there so far, at 04:32 on 11 September (UTC). Cheers, Baffle☿gab 22:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Pachyballus miniscutulus

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pachyballus miniscutulus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Fritzmann2002 -- Fritzmann2002 (talk) 19:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Scammed

edit

I Didn't Access Anything Demetriusboyd2479 (talk) 06:11, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Pachyballus miniscutulus

edit

The article Pachyballus miniscutulus you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Pachyballus miniscutulus for comments about the article, and Talk:Pachyballus miniscutulus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Fritzmann2002 -- Fritzmann2002 (talk) 13:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Evarcha striolata

edit

The article Evarcha striolata you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Evarcha striolata for comments about the article, and Talk:Evarcha striolata/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 14:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Detalik

edit

The article Detalik you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Detalik and Talk:Detalik/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 17:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Green's October 2024 edit-a-thon

edit
 

Hello Simongraham:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk) 14:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Afraflacilla refulgens

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Afraflacilla refulgens you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chipmunkdavis -- Chipmunkdavis (talk) 10:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Detalik

edit

The article Detalik you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Detalik for comments about the article, and Talk:Detalik/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 14:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Benin Air Force

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Benin Air Force you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DeadlyRampage26 -- DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 10:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Afraflacilla refulgens

edit

The article Afraflacilla refulgens you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Afraflacilla refulgens for comments about the article, and Talk:Afraflacilla refulgens/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chipmunkdavis -- Chipmunkdavis (talk) 03:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Peruvian cruiser Lima

edit

The article Peruvian cruiser Lima you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Peruvian cruiser Lima for comments about the article, and Talk:Peruvian cruiser Lima/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations - September 2024 Military History Writing Contest

edit
  The Writers Barnstar
On behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I am pleased to reward your sterling performance - 2 articles, 1 started at GA class, and 27 points - and second place finish in the September Military History Project writing contest with this award of the Writers Barnstar. Congratulations, Donner60 (talk) 01:58, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Federal Republic of Central America copyedit

edit

Since the page has been at WP:GOCE/REQ for over four months and PizzaKing13 wants a GA, I'll copyedit it. All the best, Miniapolis 12:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Content Review Medal

edit
  The Content Review Medal of Merit  
For reviewing one FAC, five FLCs, and a whopping 20 GANs for the Developing Countries WikiContest, the most of any participant, here is a special award!
... sawyer * he/they * talk 19:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

DCWC closing update

edit

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has come to a close! After a thrilling finish to the event with a slew of submissions on the final day, we have our winners. With 608 points,     Thebiguglyalien (submissions) comes in third with his series of Kiribati and Botswanan submissions;     BeanieFan11 (submissions) flies into second place at the last second with 771 points after a string of good articles about sportspersons; and after leading for much of contest's three months,     Generalissima (submissions) finishes with a whopping 798 points to take home the Gold Belt Buckle. Congratulations to our winners!

In addition to his spot in the top three,   BeanieFan11 (submissions) also wins the special awards for submitting under the most countries (44 countries) and for writing the most articles about women (15 Did you know? nominations)!   Magentic Manifestations (submissions), after making 16 submissions under the Indian flag—15 of them good articles—receives the awards for most submissions for a single country and most featured or good articles promoted. For their submission of one FAC review, five FLC reviews, and 20 GAN reviews, Simongraham (submissions) wins for most article reviews.

The results of the contest have far exceeded any expectations the coordinators had for it at the beginning: among the submissions to the event were 3 FAs, 10 FLs, 88 GAs, dozens of article reviews of every kind, and more Did you know? submissions than we can count! Regardless of your level of participation, every contestant can be proud to have contributed towards a major step in countering the systemic bias on Wikipedia. Every year, millions of readers and editors around the globe use Wikipedia to educate themselves and communicate with others about parts of the world that often receive less attention than they deserve. Thank you for participating with us in the contest and contributing to this effort. The DCWC will return next year and we look forward to seeing you contribute again! However, before that...

We need your feedback! Join the conversation on the talk page to discuss your reflections on the contest (even if you didn't participate!) and help us make it better.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Anti-Systemic Bias Barnstar

edit
  The Anti-Systemic Bias Barnstar
Thank you for participating in the Developing Countries WikiContest! You've received 397 points, and here's a special award for your contributions.

... sawyer * he/they * talk 19:12, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Pachyballus ornatus

edit

On 4 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pachyballus ornatus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although Pachyballus ornatus is named for its bright pattern, the female is dark and plain while young? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pachyballus ornatus. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pachyballus ornatus), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

edit
  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
This award is given in recognition to Simongraham for accumulating at least 25 points during the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Phintella parva

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Phintella parva you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Phintella parva

edit

The article Phintella parva you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Phintella parva and Talk:Phintella parva/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Benin Air Force GA

edit

Hey man, I've just completed the Benin Air Force/GA1. Ive made a list of recommendations and once they are tended to I should be able to pass the GA! DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 08:08, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Some baklava for you!

edit
  Thanks very much for a suportive GA review! Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Benin Air Force

edit

The article Benin Air Force you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Benin Air Force for comments about the article, and Talk:Benin Air Force/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DeadlyRampage26 -- DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 02:21, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: GA backlog drive

edit

Hello! Just a reminder that, if you have time, you are welcome to join the GA backlog drive; it runs until the end of October. You are receiving this message because you signed up on the drive page but have not yet listed any reviews. We hope to see you there! Either way, happy editing! —Ganesha811 (talk) 05:51, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Phintella parva

edit

The article Phintella parva you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Phintella parva for comments about the article, and Talk:Phintella parva/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:45, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to participate in a research

edit

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

Your GA nomination of Ndiadiane Ndiaye

edit

The article Ndiadiane Ndiaye you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Ndiadiane Ndiaye for comments about the article, and Talk:Ndiadiane Ndiaye/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Freedom4U -- Freedom4U (talk) 22:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for participating in the October 2024 GAN backlog drive

edit
  The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Your noteworthy contribution (10 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 250 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 16:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

edit

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Harpy (1909)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Harpy (1909) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 11:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Harpy (1909)

edit

The article HMS Harpy (1909) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:HMS Harpy (1909) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Harpy (1909)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HMS Savage (1910)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Savage (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 03:45, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Evarcha prosimilis

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Evarcha prosimilis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 01:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations - November 2024 Military History Writing Contest

edit
  The Writers Barnstar
On behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I am pleased to reward your sterling performance - 47 points from 8 articles - and second place finish in the November Military History Project writing contest with this award of the Writers Barnstar. Congratulations, Donner60 (talk) 01:52, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Evarcha prosimilis

edit

The article Evarcha prosimilis you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Evarcha prosimilis and Talk:Evarcha prosimilis/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 02:05, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Thor (1898)

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Thor (1898) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 14:43, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply