Talk:Cyclone Komen

Requested move 25 April 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Non-controversial request to harmonize article titles. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 00:40, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

---

Cyclonic Storm Komen → Cyclone Komen – Follow the naming rule in the NIO basin. Naughty Jeffrey (talk) 00:35, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Komen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 02:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Hurricanehink. I will be reviewing this article tonight to see whether or not it is worthy to be considered a Good Article. I have found a few issues, but that shouldn't hinder this article from being upgraded to GA, provided that the following are fixed and/or addressed in a timely manner.--12george1 (talk) 02:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

• "Cyclonic Storm Komen was an unusual tropical cyclone that originated near the southern coast of Bangladesh" - I feel like this may be a stupid question, but why exactly was it unusual? Weird track, formed unusually close to land?

• The track so close to land, one of only four cyclonic storms in the month of July, having its origins over Bangladesh and then hitting the same country. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

• "The system turned westward over land" - Saying "northwestward" would be much more accurate.

• Not really. It moved northward into Bangladesh, then it headed westward once inland. The JTWC track doesn't show it all. [1] ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

• I'm assuming no further preparations for Bangladesh and none for Myanmar, right?

• I wouldn't say none for Myanmar. I just couldn't find any good preparations. Because it was such a weak storm, I don't imagine there were storm-specific preparations in Myanmar, particularly as the area affected is populated by the persecuted Rohingya people. At most, there might have been flood warnings, but I can't find. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

• "Rain-induced landslides killed five people in Cox's Bazar, and two others died in the town due to flooding." - No info on how the other 14 people died?

• Usually once the death toll reaches ~15, the media stops reporting on individual causes and locations, and just includes the summary. There might be a government report somewhere, but I haven't found it. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

• "Offshore, the storm capsized a boat, while onshore, flooding resulted in landslides." - Is there any reason why this is here? You've already mentioned a capsized boat and landslides. Otherwise, unless there was another incident with a boat capsizing, I'd cut that off, move the second part to between the second and third sentence of that paragraph, and then do a little bit of re-wording.

• Oops, that was from an early version of the article. I moved stuff around. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

• Reference #14 is missing an accessdate.

• Done! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

That's all I could find. So fix or address these in a timely manner and I will be glad to list this as a Good Article.--12george1 (talk) 02:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, hope these are good now. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

I'm gonna pass this article now.--12george1 (talk) 17:51, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Cyclone Komen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/ABIO10-PGTW_201507270000.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTIO21-PGTW_201507281930.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTIO31-PGTW_201507290300.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTIO31-PGTW_201507290300.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTIO31-PGTW_201507292100.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTIO31-PGTW_201507300300.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/advisories/WTIO31-PGTW_201507300900.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:42, 4 July 2016 (UTC)