Talk:D'Arros Island

Latest comment: 1 year ago by FutureFlowsLoveYou in topic Inaccuracies

[Untitled]

edit

it is very interesting that an small and beautiful island is privately owned in this busi world.i hope that one day i will visit this ,or the same island.amirfarrox@yahoo.com

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on D'Arros Island. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on D'Arros Island. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Inaccuracies

edit

The island was sold in 2012 but it is not managed (nor ever was) by the Save Our Seas Foundation. The reserve that was briefly (!) declared in 2014 was supposed to be managed by the SOSF but the reserve declaration was revoked in political processes. Thus the statement under "Nature Preserve" (what does that even mean - "Preserve"??) is incorrect as it stands. In March 2020 the waters around D'Arros were declared a marine national park. St Joseph Atoll belong do a different sustainable use zone. (see www.seymsp.com) I do not understand Wikipedia referencing well enough to make these changes correctly. 84.254.86.15 (talk) 11:25, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Here's an article on finding sources, which has various hyperlinks for different articles: WP:FIND. If it was revoked in political processes, then you should try to find a WP:RELIABLE source with that information. I suppose
Here's Help:Referencing for beginners, since citation guides can be daunting.
As for the source itself, are you referring to this article I found? https://seymsp.com/news/milestone-3-gazetted/, whos full article is here: [1]
I think these could be used, but you have to show where you found the information on a website. (As these above links do), and unless it improves the article, don't remove previous sentences if they're not inaccurate. I hope this helps! FutureFlowsLoveYou (talk) 11:58, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply