Talk:D+H

Article review

Here's a first attempt at a draft for D+H. Would love some help with reviewing and editing MPS1992.M.stanoeva (talk) 21:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

@M.stanoeva:I've made some changes. Can you explain what "integrated core technology" is? It probably means something in the industry, but its appearance without explanation makes it sound potentially promotional.

I think this Draft is looking good. MPS1992 (talk) 22:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

@MPS1992: My understanding is that core integrated technology refers to technology that is integrated in and supports all aspects and steps of the operation, as in D+H’s clients would conduct all their financial business through D+H technology, rather than just certain services and processes. Does this make sense? It can be specified that it's financial management and enterprise technology if that helps. M.stanoeva (talk) 21:24, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

@M.stanoeva: thanks. I have re-worded it, as it still sounds rather too much like buzzword-speak even now that I know what it means.

I think the article is ready for review so I have submitted it for review, which might take several weeks. MPS1992 (talk) 21:34, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

@MPS1992: Thanks for all your help!M.stanoeva (talk) 13:41, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

COI Disclaimer

I'm creating this page in my role as a PR Intern for Kaiser Lachance Communications (KLC) in Toronto, Canada. D+H is a client of KLC's and asked to have their page reviewed and updated. M.stanoeva (talk) 21:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)