Talk:DMAT scam
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Cameron Dewe in topic First sentence is in the present tense
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 comment
editHi. I am working on the page.Katyaan (talk) 09:45, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
First sentence is in the present tense
editThe first sentence of this article starts off in the present tense. This implies the scam is a continuing one. While WP:TENSE advised that articles should be written in the present tense by default. When one is writing about past events the past tense should be used. It is not clear from the article that the scam has actually ceased or if it still continues under a new guise. So I have added an applicable cleanup tag. If this is historic the word "is" in the lead should be replaced by the word "was". - Cameron Dewe (talk) 08:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)