Talk:Da la Vuelta

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Da la Vuelta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129065307/http://especiales.univision.com/contentuvn/rinconlatino/plnuestro/opinion.html to http://especiales.univision.com/contentuvn/rinconlatino/plnuestro/opinion.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Da la Vuelta/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 02:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

I'll review this, comments should be added soon! Kingsif (talk) 02:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Style

• Lead good length for article
• Well written throughout, with good tone and grammar
• Pass

Coverage

• Lead comprehensive
• The background is all about how he came to record an English-language album - the song is in Spanish and, while a promotional single for that album, there is definitely way too much coverage of the entire album process so much that I really thought text had been transplanted from the album article before I got close to the relevance.
• Music and lyrics is good
• Reception has good balance of detail and quotes
• Needs work

Illustration

• A few standard chart lists
• Album cover in infobox
• Fair use music clip
• Pass

Neutrality

• Seems fine
• Pass

Stability

• History looks clear
• Pass

Verifiability

• Sources look good
• Everything cited in line
• Pass

Copyright

• Check looks good
• Good rationale for use of song clip
• Pass Kingsif (talk) 00:34, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Overall

•  On hold A good portion of the article is the outside coverage of the album's arguments, which can be cut down quite a bit. Kingsif (talk) 23:44, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

@Magiciandude: I don't think the notifications are being sent to your talkpage, so ping. Kingsif (talk) 23:45, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

@Kingsif: I'll get to work on this either this Thursday or Friday as I'm off work those two days. Erick (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

@Kingsif: I cut the background information and merged the release information with musical style section. Erick (talk) 20:31, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

@Magiciandude: That's great - I think the mention of being one of the three Spanish-language records included on Marc Anthony is sufficient background, but if some background is also added, that should be fine as long as relevant. Nice. Kingsif (talk) 22:56, 17 January 2020 (UTC)