Talk:Dabur

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 103.2.135.41 in topic Major business

For a May 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Dabur


swot analyisi of dabur — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.249.25.252 (talk) 15:14, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Big reversion

edit

I just did a big reversion on this article, looking to undo primarily this edit, which laden in a lot of praiseful, hype-y, and unsourced content and left the article looking like an ad. I've tried to reintegrate useful changes made since then, as well as address a couple of weak spots that were in the version that I reverted, but I may well have missed some things. If so, I apologize. --Nat Gertler (talk) 14:51, 3 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dabur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Merge from Dabur International

edit

This subsidiary does not seem notable, I propose merging it here. Thoughts? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi Piotrus, this is a subsidary, however it is also an entirely different business unit and does not have anything in common with Dabur, including the products and the range, which is entirely different. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurtnirvana3 (talkcontribs) 13:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Closing, given the opposition and lack of support over 18 months. Klbrain (talk) 09:33, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dabur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

promotional edits

edit

An IP has been trying to edit war in the unsourced and promotional claim "Dabur is today India’s most trusted name and the world’s largest Ayurvedic and Natural Health Care Company." This has been reverted by multiple editors, and should not be readded until consensus is found on this talk page that it should be included. --Nat Gertler (talk) 17:24, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:26, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dantkaranti paste was not a good product

edit

This dantkaranti paste i am using 2months it gives mouth infection tongue ulcer problem not to me this paste using 1day 2 times using this product all familys members are also using this product they are also have saying to me all familys members have ulcers problem using this paste i am also identified it was not expire product it product in summer season that time it was not given any problem then I will using this paste in winter they perform not good that creates mouths ulcers in all my family then one doctor have identified then say change your paste . 103.154.9.34 (talk) 10:22, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Major business

edit

1) hair oil 2)shampoos 3) health supplements 4)digestives 5) skin care 6)foods 7)oral care 8)OTC & ethicals 9) home care 10) Guar gum 103.2.135.41 (talk) 16:27, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply