Talk:Dag Heward-Mills
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dag Heward-Mills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924204940/http://www.christianpress.com/us/culture-a-society/494-african-evangelist-sending-missionaries-to-the-us-dag-heward-mills.html to http://www.christianpress.com/us/culture-a-society/494-african-evangelist-sending-missionaries-to-the-us-dag-heward-mills.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
NPOV
editDear Wikipedians,
I added the NPOV template to the already-present issue template, because much of the information on this page is either from websites directly associated with the subject, or the information is poorly sourced. In certain cases the links do not function, in others the links don't lead to the actual information the source should refer to but to the overarching website. Some of the grander statements offer no proof, for instance: "Heward-Mills is also one of the best-selling authors in the Christian world today" which has no reference at all. If anyone has any way of finding third-party information on this subject or more accurate links or citations, that would be much appreciated.
Controversy section
editThe current Controversy section is very poorly-sourced (including Facebook, Reddit, YouTube). I think it should probably be cut down to only what is reliably sourced - it looks as if The Fourth Estate is a reliable source. Do others have views? Tacyarg (talk) 12:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- You are right but some of the allegations may be substantiated, see [1] Yen.com.gh [2] thefourthestategh.com. The article needs neutral description of relevant significant facts. Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 06:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)