Talk:Dainik Jagran
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dainik Jagran article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI have started editing & writing about this topic.So far it has been giving inadequate information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhruvpubby (talk • contribs) 11:45, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
I removed a {{verify}} tag, because quite frankly there is nothing in this article that needs verification. The article doesn't need verfication, it needs writing (which is why it has a stub tag). So far we have the equivalent of "The New York Times is an English-language newspaper circulated primarily in the United States". Vineviz 21:02, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- Perhaps an {{expert}} tag would be appropriate, but I don't think so. Someon with some knowledge of Indian media could develop this into a full-fledged stub. Vineviz 21:05, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
This page has been a stub for a while, so I am going to add a {{expert}} tag, and hopefully someone will see this and improve it. Lithpiperpilot 19:27, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- I removed the stub tag because in my view, it isn't a stub anymore. Twin.priyanka (talk) 16:00, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Pls dont delete the article. I will rewrite in a week's time. Gs44631 (talk) 15:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
In this page : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_newspapers_in_India_by_readership the circulation is shown to be 16 million while here it is 2.7 million. Why this anomaly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijyes (talk • contribs) 11:00, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
for mba
edittell me about future of mba in manufacturing!117.197.146.49 (talk) 13:22, 6 April 2009 (UTC) [email protected]117.197.146.49 (talk) 13:22, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
This is not a networking site. Misuse of talk page would lead to deletion of your idGs44631 (talk) 15:11, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dainik Jagran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140202225905/http://mruc.net/irs2013_topline_findings.pdf to http://mruc.net/irs2013_topline_findings.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Dainik Jagran has apologised for mistaking Dileep Kumar in the Actress abduction case.Shouldn't that too be mentioned. (45.248.92.96 (talk) 13:47, 25 January 2018 (UTC)) Shouldn't that too be mentioned.
since no body contested.. adding that apology had been made. (45.248.92.96 (talk) 04:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC))
Apology is being added as there is no one contesting (45.248.92.96 (talk) 08:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC))