Talk:Dalston Kingsland railway station

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Pax #s as doubtful as ever

edit

How can these figures entered in the article with so much enthusiasm be considered meaningful? OK, they show what was counted in some way but they typically fluctuate wildly (as here) and the source, the ORR, proclaims that the counting methodology and effectiveness are in constant states of flux. Mostly they depend on some number of tickets which clearly with the ever-changing ways of paying fares in not a solid base.--SilasW (talk) 20:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

please enter alternative data that you think is more accurate. They are estimated annual entry and exit with a specified source (talk) 09:32, 12 March 2011 (UTC)}Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dalston Kingsland railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply