This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I believe Walsh meets notability criteria based on the widespread national attention she received from press in 2008 as a result of her run against Nancy Pelosi and Cindy Sheehan in the San Francisco district (8th CD). I have removed the tag; if you disagree, please explain why below. See also: WP:BIO— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonschr (talk • contribs) 21:50, 16 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
I believe you are mistaken - she did not get attention from the press - she is noteworthy because she raised a ton of money via professional fund raising firms and instead of running in her own district against Jackie Speier she is running against Pelosi as it makes her more money in donations. She is not running a serious campaign - she is running to get money and fund raising contacts. She also lies and continues to flout basic ethics such as reposting a video that has been removed from various sites due to copyright violations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.106.59.170 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
