Talk:Dara Shikoh

Latest comment: 2 months ago by SerChevalerie in topic "External links" moved

Untitled

edit

Regarding his other achievements, his architectural contributions seem to find no mention in the article. If its possible, adding some detail regarding say, Char Chinar or Pari mahal in Srinagar, both of which he commisioned, would be worthwhile. I shouldn't say this, but I think he derserves it! Vaultaiir 17:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree with Vaultair - his architectural achievements would be a worthwhile addition to an appreciation of the life of this widely loved prince.

I think the whole "Mughal Crown Prince" section should be removed as it has nothing to do with Dara Shikoh's life. It also contains several unsubstantiated assertions and is marred by untranslated words and verses incomprehensible to an English speaker. The reduction of the power struggle between the Sikhs and Mughals to some kind of personal animosity between Aurangzeb and Guru Gobind, or worse to a religious clash, is simplistic in the extreme. Both Guru Tegh Bahadur and Guru Gobind served under Mughal military command at different times and Aurangzeb only attacked Anandpur in 1705 at the behest of the Hindu rajas of the Sivalik hills. Guru Gobind also enjoyed cordial relations with Aurangzeb's son Bahadur Shah.

The sikh-history.com website [1] points out that

"The epistle Zafarnamah sent by Guru Gobind Singh from Dina seems to have touched the heart of Emperor Aurungzeb. He forthwith invited him for a meeting. According to Ahkam-i-Alamgiri, the Emperor had a letter written to the deputy governor of Lahore, Munim Khan, to conciliate the Guru and make the required arrangements for his journey to the Deccan."

By all means let us celebrate the life of the great humanitarian Dara Shikoh, but not at the expense of simplistic chauvinistic interpretations of complex historical phenomena.

Itihasi 23:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

According to the contemporary chronicler Bernier [2], it was not Aurangzeb but the slave Nazir who beheaded Dara. Bernier continues:

The head was instantly carried to Aureng-Zebe, who commanded that it should be placed in a dish, and that water should be brought. The blood was then washed from the face, and when it could no longer be doubted [*103*] that it was indeed the head of Dara, he shed tears, and said, 'Ai Bad-bakht ["Bed-bakt"]! Ah wretched one! let this shocking sight no more offend my eyes, but take away the head, and let it be buried in Humayun's tomb.

This also seems to be the opinion of another contemporary chronicler and champion of Dara Shikoh, Niccolo Manucci. [3]

Can anyone shed further light on this?

--Itihasi 11:08, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Images

edit

New image: Dara Shikoh as a boy

edit
 
Dara Shikoh as a boy.

See right (File:Dara Shikoh as a boy - Google Art Project cropped.jpg). Cropped from full image File:Dara Shikoh as a boy - Google Art Project.jpg. Dcoetzee 07:26, 5 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Dara Shikoh/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
I agree with Vaultair - his architectural achievements would be a worthwhile addition to an appreciation of the life of this widely loved prince.

I think the whole "Mughal Crown Prince" section should be removed as it has nothing to do with Dara Shikoh's life. It also contains several unsubstantiated assertions and is marred by untranslated words and verses incomprehensible to an English speaker. The reduction of the power struggle between the Sikhs and Mughals to some kind of personal animosity between Aurangzeb and Guru Gobind, or worse to a religious clash, is simplistic in the extreme. Both Guru Tegh Bahadur and Guru Gobind served under Mughal military command at different times and Aurangzeb only attacked Anandpur in 1705 at the behest of the Hindu rajas of the Sivalik hills. Guru Gobind also enjoyed cordial relations with Aurangzeb's son Bahadur Shah.

The sikh-history.com website [4] points out that

"The epistle Zafarnamah sent by Guru Gobind Singh from Dina seems to have touched the heart of Emperor Aurungzeb. He forthwith invited him for a meeting. According to Ahkam-i-Alamgiri, the Emperor had a letter written to the deputy governor of Lahore, Munim Khan, to conciliate the Guru and make the required arrangements for his journey to the Deccan."

By all means let us celebrate the life of the great humanitarian Dara Shikoh, but not at the expense of simplistic chauvinistic interpretations of complex historical phenomena.

Itihasi 22:40, 12 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Regarding his achievements, it might be worthwhile to include some information on the various architectural monuments that he personally commissioned, like Pari Mahal and Char Chinar in the modern city of Srinagar. If this is acceptable, I'd like to edit the article to include a number of such references, all sooourced from historiography. I probably shouldn't say this, but I think he derserves it!

Vaultaiir 17:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 23:28, 12 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 12:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dara Shikoh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dara Shukoh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dara Shukoh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

bias bias bias full of opinion statements — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.163.215.205 (talk) 17:02, 7 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

"External links" moved

edit

Moving from "External links" section:

* Bernier, Francois Travels in the Mogul Empire, AD 1656–1668

SerChevalerie (talk) 20:05, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply