Talk:Dark Energy Survey
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
updates
editThis article needs updates from the University of Chicago students :)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on The Dark Energy Survey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.darkenergysurvey.org/DECam/camera.shtm - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720152822/https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/reports/proposal-standalone.pdf to https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/reports/proposal-standalone.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/the-project/survey_documents/DES-DETF/Supplements_DES-DETF_v1.6.pdf - Added
{{dead link}}tag to https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/the-project/survey_documents/DES-DETF/weinberg.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720152822/https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/reports/proposal-standalone.pdf to https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/reports/proposal-standalone.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:34, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on The Dark Energy Survey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141022043124/http://des-brazil.linea.gov.br/ to http://des-brazil.linea.gov.br//
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927014806/http://astro.uchicago.edu/~frieman/Courses/A411/Lecture5/Estrada-CCDs.pdf to http://astro.uchicago.edu/~frieman/Courses/A411/Lecture5/Estrada-CCDs.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720152813/https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/terms/redshift.shtml to https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/terms/redshift.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Major new find by DES
editPublished Bibcode:2018ApJ...854...37S in IOP Science on 8 Feb 2018, summary at on Space.com. Redshift Z=2 means that UV emissions are redshifted to terrestrial-visible wavelengths. Very neat. LeadSongDog come howl! 16:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 12 May 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved(closed by non-admin page mover) Kostas20142 (talk) 14:16, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
The Dark Energy Survey → Dark Energy Survey – This article itself favors leaving off the "The" more often than not. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 23:46, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support per WP:THE. Rreagan007 (talk) 02:19, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support per WP:THE, per the survey's website title, and the prominent central use of DES as a name at the website. Randy Kryn (talk) 01:14, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support Request appears perfectly reasonable. Kintpuash (talk) 12:51, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- Suppot. Pretty standard WP:THE. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:14, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Wiki Education assignment: Astroparticle Physics
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2022 and 8 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dzw785784663 (article contribs).
What do results mean?
editResults are stated as technical facts such as numerical measurements. Those of us who are not experts would like some plain English explanation. For example, under Cosmology, what do we learn about cosmology from these measurements? Do we learn that standard cosmological models are contradicted, or supported, or neither? Zaslav (talk) 02:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)