Based on domain name, stock symbol, etc. it appears clear that Datamatics Global Services Ltd and Datamatics Global Services are the one in the same. Per WP:NAME, the article should live under the one without the legal status ("LTD.") unless it is needed to disambiguate between two organizations of similar name. In this case, though, the other version of the article might have more content. How best to choose? Cander0000 (talk) 05:16, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
This is indeed sad, as I thought that Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia that aims to allow anyone to edit articles. But it does not seem so anymore. You are not even taking the slight interest to check if the information provided is disputable or is available on other platforms as well. The information provided on this page has been collaborated by using links and references from several other individual contributing websites. Don't know why this is being edited in this is the case? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avanchak (talk • contribs) 06:04, 3 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
- Oh yes, even though I do not personally agree with the policy, anyone can edit, but also anyone can revert. The hope is that eventually articles will comply with style guidelines that have been agreed to by consensus. This one clearly does not comply, being fairly promotional, and using marketing-style instead of, for example, using capital letters for proper nouns as described in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters. W Nowicki (talk) 17:34, 29 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
