Talk:David Holzman's Diary

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Library of Congress Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Awkward phrasing

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

To me the opening paragraphs of the lead don't seem to flow very well (grammar and punctuation feel awkward).

David Holzman's Diary is a 1967 American film, directed by Jim McBride, which interrogates the art of documentary-making.

It may be considered a docufiction: paradoxically, despite the film is in fact a false autobiography and documentary, «a fairy tale», it represents the filmmaker's life and experience and also the world in which the action takes place with documentary realist techniques. The mirror metaphor is explicit in the film as code for reality.

A fellow editor, --75.188.199.98 (talk) 16:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Credits

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is there a reason the (overly long) synopsis treats the existence of end credits like a mindblowing plot twist? Nerdwizard (talk) 23:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic