Talk:De Beneficiis

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Literature / Ancient Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Ancient philosophy

Dialogi

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

According to the Oxford Companion to Classical Literature, De Beneficiis is not part of the Dialogi. Any thoughts on this being changed?

Zexer19 (talk) 03:31, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Clean-up

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed the long "Synopsis" and lists of "Persons mentioned in the text" from this article ([1]). The synopsis was just a copy-and-paste from the contents page of the Aubrey Stewart translation [2] - as it stands it is too cryptic for an encyclopedia article, it's better just to link to the page on wikisource if there is any need for people to see it. The index of names copied-and-pasted into this article was pretty meaningless content. Pasicles (talk) 01:53, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quotes

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I was just involved in an article review where I was reminded of the Manual of Style guidelines that blockquotes should not be used for quotes of less than 40 words, and the use of pull quotes should be avoided unless there is a reason why that quotes highlights a main theme in the topic. I'll make those changes. -- Zac Δ ^talk! 04:36, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic