Talk:Deafness in Thailand
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
About the missing Lead section
editThis article is part of a WikiEdu project that is currently in progress. The Lead section will be added within a few weeks. Matthall.research (talk) 21:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Language Emergence section
editNo significant improvement since initial submission: score remains 2.5/3 Matthall.research (talk) 23:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Significant Organizations section
editNice improvement here, although it's still not clear which of these are Deaf-led. Score: 2.75/3 Matthall.research (talk) 23:53, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Human/Civil Rights section
editNo meaningful improvement: score remains 2/3. Matthall.research (talk) 23:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Primary & Secondary Education
editGenerally good content, but the final paragraph still lacks citations, which prevents me from giving this a higher score than 2/3. Matthall.research (talk) 00:01, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Employment
editThis section is great! Clearly organized, well-cited, providing both big-picture context and relevant details. Excellent work! Score: 3/3 Matthall.research (talk) 00:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Healthcare
editThe content you present here focuses on hearing technologies, as if you view deafness as the primary threat to DHH people's health. That's quite disconcerting to see at this point in the course! The goal of this section is to report on how DHH people manage to keep their whole selves (mind and body) healthy: how do they develop health literacy, communicate with healthcare providers, access information from public health authorities, etc. I'm afraid I can't give this anything higher than a 1/3. Matthall.research (talk) 00:08, 30 November 2022 (UTC)