Talk:Delta Air Lines Flight 89

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 January 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

With the current detail in this article, 8 paragraphs, and 9 sources, I see no reason for deletion. Does anyone still believe this should be removed?

While I don’t believe it should be deleted, you should be asking this on the AfD page itself. Shelbystripes (talk) 03:53, 17 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Max landing weight

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I find the claim that the 777-200ER is "not capable" of landing over its certified max landing weight to be an overly simplistic explanation of a regulatory limit. Like other operating limitations such as V speeds, maximum landing weight is meant as guidance—perhaps strong guidance, but guidance nonetheless. An 250-ton aircraft will not fall apart if it lands at 1 lb over its certified max landing weight. Carguychris (talk) 23:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

It's been a week, and there have been no comments or improvements, so I've removed the disputed sentences. I think the referenced statement from the commentator is adequate; this article doesn't need to go into the weeds regarding the technicalities of fuel dumping and the FARs. Carguychris (talk) 13:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

FAA Memorandum Concerning Incident

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

FAA Memorandum said to be published February 6, 2020 provides details about the pilot choices and clarifies situation with investigative results: [1] Undoubtedlyunoriginal (talk) 02:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic