Talk:Demographics of Uttar Pradesh
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Demographics of Uttar Pradesh article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
bn,,.m,m,m,..,.,. . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.184.187.141 (talk) 10:46, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
The sub regions of UP depicted in the map are wrong
editThe sub regions of UP depicted in the article reflect the political ambitions of some, not the real sub regions of UP. E.g., Harit Pradesh is (was) the ambition of a political party and does not constitute a geographical or political sub-region. In fact, it consists of parts of Doab, Rohilkhand and Awadh. Likewise, the Awadh region shown in the map actually consists large parts of Doab. This map needs to be replaced. Does someone has an objection to it? (Awadhi (talk) 20:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC))
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Demographics of Uttar Pradesh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110409075417/http://www.censusindia.gov.in:80/2011-prov-results/DATA_FILES/Final%20PPT%202011_12.PDF to http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/DATA_FILES/Final%20PPT%202011_12.PDF
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160308041742/http://5forty3.in/2014/01/uttar-pradesh-the-darling-of-2014/ to http://5forty3.in/2014/01/uttar-pradesh-the-darling-of-2014/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 July 2019
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "Allahabad" and "Faizabad" District to "Prayagraj" and "Ayodhya" District respectively. As the name of these 2 districts has been restored to their respective original names. AashishJha26 (talk) 07:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Not done and won't be done - as we always use the common-name in English, not the "official" name - Arjayay (talk) 10:25, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under the subsection Racial and ancestral makeup, when it talks about about Muslims in the second paragraph, please delete the sentence about Rohillas as there is no source to back this up.--2600:100C:A211:92FA:3861:2F42:4B1A:876E (talk) 06:00, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Not done The entire section appears to be sourced to a book (the citation is at the end of the section). --RegentsPark (comment) 13:23, 27 June 2022 (UTC)