Talk:Der brænder en ild

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Carbrera in topic GA Review
Former good article nomineeDer brænder en ild was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 16, 2016Good article nomineeNot listed
June 30, 2016Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Failed GA-nomination

edit

I will expand this article very soon and then re-nominate. I'm sure it will pass. Peace out! Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your prize!) 20:08, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Additions have been made and the article has been re-nominated. Sorry for the long delay. Best, Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your prize!) 16:29, 23 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Der Brænder en Ild/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 04:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)Reply


Infobox

edit
  • The movie poster image requires an alt description, so please add one
  • Any sources out there for the "budget" parameter?
  • Any sources out there for the "gross" parameter?

Lead

edit

Paragraph 3

edit
  • "Like several other films adapted by Korch's popular family novels, the film developed a cult following and is regarded as one of the best from the Korch-era." --> No source for this in the lead (or in the article); please add one

Plot

edit
  • All great! :)

Cast

edit
  • Great!

Production

edit
  • There's no mention of the film being based off the book of the same name by Morten Korch here? This is a major piece to the article (and the film in particular!)
  • "The highly experienced Henning Karmark was the head producer of the film.[1]" --> "highly experienced" sounds a bit bias; please remove

Release and reception

edit
  • "Journalist Svend Kragh-Jacobsen of Berlingske wrote a favorable review of the film on its release date.[8]" --> Anything to note about Kragh–Jacobsen's review here?
  • "The film was distributed to home media on DVD in 2003 and again in 2014 by Nordisk Film.[7]" --> Were both releases distributed by Nordisk Film?

End of GA Review:

edit

A very good article with just a few mistakes. At first, I thought this may be missing some key things, but after a quick Google search, I realized this movie's article is really using all of its sources out there and ix extremely broad in its coverage! Great work! Please @PING me here with any questions, comments, or concerns. Once again, good job! Thanks and cheers, Carbrera (talk) 02:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)!Reply

Sorry, but I failed the article due to inactivity for over a week. Please renominate it in the future and I'll gladly review it again. Thanks. Cheers, Carbrera (talk) 03:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC).Reply