Talk:Derrick Walton

Latest comment: 6 years ago by WikiOriginal-9 in topic GA Review
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Derrick Walton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Derrick Walton/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 20:01, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead/Infobox

edit

Early life

edit

College

edit

Freshman

edit

Sophomore

edit

Junior

edit

Senior

edit

Professional career

edit

References

edit

Done now. If you disagree with anything, feel free to say. Some of these things may be open to interpretation. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 01:24, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Other comments

edit
  • Another user also just changed his current team to the Heat. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 21:56, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • "By late December, Walton had used half of his allotment of NBA days while the Heat roster was enduring 6 concurrent injuries" The source says he has used 22 of 45 days, so that's not exactly half. Also, if he stays on the roster for a few more games, then this phrase is going to need to be updated to say "more than half" or something.
    • The source from the 19th says 22 of 45 possible days. He played in the game on the 20th so we know he was on the roster at least another day and I see no source claiming he has been sent back down yet, so it is a near certainty that he will be on the roster tomorrow the 22nd and 23rd. They are on a homestand of games 22nd, 23rd, 26th, and 29th. I would not be surprised if he soon exhausts his days given the Heat injury situation. That aside, the 20th takes us over half and he is likely to continue to be on the active roster for the Heat in the near future.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:26, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply