Talk:Destruction of the al-Jalaa building
This article was nominated for deletion on 17 May 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
On 16 July 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Destruction of al-Jalaa Building to Destruction of the al-Jalaa Building. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 January 2022
editThis edit request to Destruction of al-Jalaa Building has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the lede, the concluding-sentence goes:
The event generated significant controversy, as the building contained offices for news agencies Associated Press (AP) and Al Jazeera.
. Also, the very first sentence of the "Destruction" section goes:
On 15 May the IDF targeted the al-Jalaa Building in Gaza, among the occupants of which were Al Jazeera and the Associated Press.[1][2][3][4]
Both should instead read ‘...Associated Press, Al Jazeera and other news outlets...’ & ‘...which were Al Jazeera, Associated Press and other news outlets..’; per
this, this & this, and multiple confirmations from statements which confirm that it was the Al Jazeera network's Gaza bureau as a whole, and not simply the one of its flagship Standard Arabic-channel, as I understand it's the common practice to refer to that article whenever any broad-reference to the network is made across this site. This ought to stop. The Agence France-Presse's own workers even "mentioned" Al Jazeera English's "handle" on Twitter when announcing their decision of offering shelter to the affected journalists.
Optional fix: The term “...they're..” in
Despite saying they're in possession of proof for their allegations,
phrase should read in full.
Regards. —103.163.124.68 (talk) 11:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC) Edited: 12:33, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 16 July 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) asilvering (talk) 07:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Destruction of al-Jalaa Building → Destruction of the al-Jalaa Building – The usual grammatical convention would be to say "the al-Jalaa Building", and this can be seen in multiple sources. — The Anome (talk) 09:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC) — The Anome (talk) 09:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. The Night Watch (talk) 21:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)