Talk:Devgadh Baria

Merge proposal

Devgadh Baria and Devgadbaria appear to be the same place. Gimboid13 21:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

it would be right to merge the two but pl do so under the name with two seperate words as it is the correct manner. i hail from there and therefore i know! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Muktiraj (talk • contribs)

The Place Devgad Baria, Devgadh Baria, Deogarh Baria or sometime Baria itself refers to the same place, the taluka head quarter located in Dahod District. It can be verified from gvt records also. The spelling Devgad Baria was used when it was a princly state, now after independance the word Devgadh Baria has replaced old one. So story is simple, merge both. HUSAIN_HQ —Preceding unsigned comment added by HUSAIN HQ (talk • contribs) 13:41, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

merge done

Merged Devgadbaria to Devgadh Baria per discussion, above. -- phoebe / (talk) 20:27, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Another merge needed

Baria, India appears to be the same near identical article as this one and so needs to be merged, Devgadh Baria would appear to be a better name so the propsal would be to merge to this article.KTo288 (talk) 20:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

There are many `barias' in india. Merger will save search-time.Bharat bhushan kapoor (talk) 04:13, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Actually, Devgadh Baria name came from two different sources. 1. Devgadh - A hill "Devgadh means hill of the God" 2. Baria - Name of a tribe in Gujarat

As the city was under footsteps of Devgadh, and populated mainly with people from Baria tribe, the name "Devgadh Baria" was adapted. Logically there should be two different pages one for the city/town which is to be titled "Devgadh Baria" where as the second page or the page titled "Baria" should deal with Baria tribe of Gujarat. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HUSAIN HQ (talk • contribs) 11:14, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

The two articles are nearly identical. They should be merged. There is no question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.106.166.62 (talk) 04:53, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

royal bias

While royal history is important, this should be presented without a bias and be more objective.

"he had already established himself as a king in everybody’s hearts [clarification needed]. During his rule Sir Madhavsinh Lalji Chuahn was the superintendent of police of Baria State. He was devoted to his duty and rewarded for his duty."

Can also move to a section on the royal family.

There is also a lack of post-royalty history and modern era information etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.233.184.16 (talk) 16:54, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Page views

Leo1pard (talk) 15:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC)