This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Add {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)|class=|importance=|atlanta=|atlanta-importance=}} project banner to Atlanta-related articles to talk pages and assess.
Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality.
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The critical reception of this film is about as clownish as the travesty itself. Not everyone has time to watch three or four documentaries, and I've never personally ever seen one of these documentaries televised anywhere. Devil's Knot is on Netflix, I intend to try to get my grandfather who was the circuit judge initially assigned the case (it was reassigned/relinquished to a person who welcomed the media attention) to watch this. He wouldn't watch documentaries, but maybe he will watch a drama. It's a fine film as films go. It's not supposed to reveal something about human nature. This is real-life, not fiction, it would be a mockery of real people to do that. Critics are no better and no more enlightened than the community and so-called judicial system that are the subject of the film--184.63.132.236 (talk) 08:35, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
