MrsSnoozyTurtle I see that you are repeatedly placing Notability tag despite new page patroller reviewed the article without any issue. I have opened this discussion to resolve the dispute. I am surprised despite having WP:SIGCOV references per WP:RS, you are not happy with the notability. Let us fix the issue here. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Hello Twinkle1990. The notability concern is that the article lacks in-depth coverage in non-WP:ROUTINE sources. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
- @MrsSnoozyTurtle The article has been reviewed by experienced new page patroller Onel5969 on 13 Deecember 2022. Onel5969 is highly experienced page reviewer/patroller. If they don't see any issue then you are now questioning their ability. Twinkle1990 (talk) 12:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
- No I am not. I greatly appreciate the work of Onel5659, but we don't have to agree on everything.
- An NPP check doesn't guarantee that an article is notable. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
- If you are so confident about notability, why don't you AfD the article? Let's the AfD to decide the notability. Twinkle1990 (talk) 09:49, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply