Talk:Die Weiße Rose (film)

Untitled

True or false: this article should re-direct to White Rose. 66.245.14.250 01:39, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)

True, methinks, as long as the information here is already contained within White Rose. If not, toss it in somewhere and then make it happen. -- Grunt 01:40, 2004 Jun 23 (UTC)

Wait a tic; this was about a movie, not the actual movement. -- Grunt 01:42, 2004 Jun 23 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Die Weiße Rose film.jpg

Image:Die Weiße Rose film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Distribution

The information in the "Distribution"-section is not supported by the given source. I looked it up because the phrasing is very unclear about the implied legal obstacles and the information sounds odd and maybe distorted. Can someone elaborate on that and maybe improve the section? Knaxberg (talk) 22:18, 14 June 2023 (UTC)