Talk:Digboi

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

This article needs a POV-ectomy. RickK 06:37, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)

Guideline

edit

Oldest oil well in the world?

edit

This article makes the astounding claim that Digboi has the oldest running oil well in the world, without offering any substantiation. It says, "Crude oil was discovered here in late 19th century, in a span of ten years when the discovery of Oil took place in first Oil drilling in the world. Digboi oilfield has the oldest running oil well in the world [citation needed]. The Wikipedia article, Petroleum, says "The world's first commercial oil well was drilled in Poland in 1853." The History of petroleum article says "The earliest known oil wells were drilled in China in 347 AD or earlier." The Hindu Business Line article cited here says "In 1866, i.e. seven years after oil was struck in the US, Indias [sic] first oil well was drilled at Nahorpung, about 30 miles south-east of Digboi, at a depth of 102 ft. In 1889, the first commercial well was struck in Digboi at a depth of 662 ft." In any case, Digboi would be a late-comer. Digboi surely did not see the earliest oil drilling in the world; and whether any the earliest wells are producing today is a question of fact (not shown). Fconaway (talk) 00:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

The plaque on the discovery well, Digboi Well No. 1, [http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=852000] says it was spudded in by percussion method in September, 1889. Oil was struck on October 19, 1889, and commercial production started in November, 1890. Flow ceased in 1927, and the well was abandoned in 1932.
Although some of the other wells may be in production, even today, although at low rates, their actual age is not stated. Instead, the Digboi refinery relies on production from surrounding regions. Is Digboi the oldest producing field in India? Fconaway (talk) 01:30, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.internationalsteam.co.uk/mills/indiamill17.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 08:32, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Digboi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:32, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply