 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the Baru seed page were merged into Dipteryx alata on 6 May 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Moved and redirected to new topic: Baru Tree. Baru has already been taken.
. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bowzee (talk • contribs) 21:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- An improper move that was a copy & paste that wasn't discussed and certainly isn't in line with WP:FLORA. I fixed the page with a history merge and moved it back to the species name. Rkitko (talk) 04:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Baru seed
editAs far as the new article "baru seed" can attest to, the name "baru seed" has been coined in 2012 by Portuguese-speaking authors in a food science paper. The other paper cited uses "baru almond". A company calling itself "Baru Baron" has started marketing this as a product in Canada as of 2018, promoting it as "the new superfood". The Wikipedia article appears to closely parrot the marketing by this company. I would say the name "baru seed" has little historical usage, though with superfood fads who knows how excited consumers will get.86.83.56.115 (talk) 19:51, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- This sounds about right. The baru seed article seems pretty unsourced and headers read more like a guide on how to eat them as of now. Not sure if it has enough separate notability to warrant a standalone article like Sunflower seed. Even quinoa just has the food product information integrated into general biological information. originalmesshow u doin that busta rhyme? 04:50, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Baru seed should be merged here. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:12, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dipteryx alata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627000000/http://www.iucnredlist.org to http://www.iucnredlist.org
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:42, 13 December 2016 (UTC)