Talk:Divergent (film)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Divergent (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 22 July 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
I Agree
editI was unaware of all the notability guidelines and didn't fully review all the necessary things before accepting the article that I wanted created. I agree that this page should be deleted until such time that principal photography has taken place. Peter Davenport (talk) 04:52, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- I went ahead and included most of this article in the original article for the book under the Adaptation section. here
TheLastElection14.com -- marketing site?
editDoes anyone know if the Divergent website having the identical timer countdown as TheLastElection14.com means that the latter is just a marketing site for the former? That seems to be the theory @ http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2511567/pg1 142.229.81.9 (talk) 17:27, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Reviews
edit41% is not mixed! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.144.32.73 (talk) 23:06, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- The 41% at Rotten Tomatoes is not a 41/100 rating. The average rating is 5.4/10. It means 41% liked it (they call it "fresh"). The reception is mixed; read the entire Critical response section. --82.136.210.153 (talk) 02:39, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
It would be good if the quotes reflected the mixed reception; they're too focused on the positive at the moment. IntriguingStar (talk) 09:15, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/divergent-2014. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Fezzerof(talk)/(contribs) 03:46, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Action film - D:<
editThis is a lie. Divergent is no action film and people know it. You guys think it's an action movie because they have guns? Bullshit! Give me some evidence by some mute jackasses that think this awful thriller film is an action movie. I'd be humored by whatever is thrown at me -Theironminer (talk) 21:33, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- No, you are in error. IMDB places it as Action, Adventure and Sci-Fi. Now, do be civil.20.137.2.50 (talk) 00:32, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
IMDB is not a reliable source, actual sources need to be displayed, IMDB is not a good resource. - Theironminer (talk) 04:17, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Box office mojo and the film's own marketing both use action-adventure. Also, the film does contain what can only be described as action sequences, irrespective of your personal opinion of how well executed those sequences are (and at just 41% positive, plenty of critics agree with you!) IntriguingStar (talk) 09:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Divergent (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6CrNMCA0g?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.criticschoice.com%2Fmovie-awards%2F to http://www.criticschoice.com/movie-awards/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140908202237/http://www.eonefilmsmedia.ca/pdfs/divergent%20production%20notes%20-%20tour_8h9itjsa.pdf to http://www.eonefilmsmedia.ca/pdfs/divergent%20production%20notes%20-%20tour_8h9itjsa.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Divergent (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/544594/20140324/divergent-earns-56-million-weekend-premiere-sequel.htm - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130511183826/http://www.divergentfans.com/profiles/blogs/veronica-roth-and-lionsgate-movie-studio-respond-to-theo-james-ca to http://www.divergentfans.com/profiles/blogs/veronica-roth-and-lionsgate-movie-studio-respond-to-theo-james-ca
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130518002958/http://pagetopremiere.com/2013/04/images-video-from-divergent-movie-set-in-chicago-houses-in-abnegation-what-do-you-think-this-is/ to http://pagetopremiere.com/2013/04/images-video-from-divergent-movie-set-in-chicago-houses-in-abnegation-what-do-you-think-this-is/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130711040156/http://pagetopremiere.com/2013/04/divergent-set-photos-ferris-wheel-scene-being-filmed-on-navy-pier/ to http://pagetopremiere.com/2013/04/divergent-set-photos-ferris-wheel-scene-being-filmed-on-navy-pier/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130719091232/http://www.divergentfans.com/profiles/blogs/divergent-movie-set-update-more-images-from-the-abnegation-set to http://www.divergentfans.com/profiles/blogs/divergent-movie-set-update-more-images-from-the-abnegation-set
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140514162128/http://m.orlandoweekly.com/film/film-version-of-divergent-is-a-worthy-effort-1.1656806 to http://m.orlandoweekly.com/film/film-version-of-divergent-is-a-worthy-effort-1.1656806
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.criticschoice.com/movie-awards/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Plot: Main Character is 'Divergent'
editIn an earlier edit, an editor removed the sentence that introduced the concept of the secret, Divergent faction. Added sentence to introduce the faction of the Divergent class of the population. Added sentence to introduce the Factionless class of the population. Also, clarification of Factionless and Divergent. Also clarified that the protagonist, Tris is secretly Divergent. Please, discuss, revert, edit or remove as needed. B'H. 172.250.246.150 (talk) 23:03, 17 December 2018 (UTC)