A fact from Dominic Tweddle appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 April 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Thanks for your review of the page Dominic Tweddle@Boleyn:. I've added categories and removed the request for inline citations; I'm not sure why the latter was there, since inline citation were already used throughout. Regarding notability, I think he meets the WP:PROF guidelines in three ways:
1) Research with a significant impact: He is the main person responsible for the research on the Coppergate helmet, and in doing so published the most comprehensive typology of Anglo-Saxon and Viking helmets (Tweddle 1992)
Thanks for taking the time to explain that to me, Usernameunique. I'll remove the notability tag. My only remaining concern is the 'Bibliography' section - is it suggested further reading or sources that should be inlnie? Thanks again for your hard work on this, Boleyn (talk) 18:32, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks again for your work and input, Boleyn. I'm not sure what exactly the difference is between 'Bibliography' and 'Further reading' sections; to bridge the difference I've added citations to ensure that each source supports a particular part of the page. Hope that works! Thanks, --Usernameunique (talk) 00:47, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply