- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:11, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Dominic Tweddle
edit
The Anglo-Saxon Coppergate helmet
- ... that before becoming director of the National Museum of the Royal Navy, Dominic Tweddle helped excavate the Coppergate helmet (pictured), and published a chronology of post-Roman helmet types? Source: Tweddle 1992 is all about the excavation. Per Härke 1993, Tweddle wrote "a wide-ranging survey, from Pictland to Kiev, of post-Roman helmet types, their distributions and their dating."
- Reviewed: Willem Ravelli
5x expanded by Usernameunique (talk). Self-nominated at 21:02, 10 March 2018 (UTC).
The text of the article, which I believe is what counts, is five times expanded. Well-cited throughout, neutrally written, no signs of copyvio. Hook is cited to two online sources — one written by the subject of the article, but a reliable source not self-published, so I see no objection. I do have a quibble with the link to Late Roman ridge helmet, which is surely off-topic? That link would perhaps be better left out when this comes to be promoted, or we might say "post-Roman helmet types"? QPQ done, image is licensed. Moonraker (talk) 10:44, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- Happy with either version. The Coppergate helmet is a stylistic derivative of late Roman ridge helmets, so I don't think the link is off topic. --Usernameunique (talk) 21:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
