Talk:Downsizing (film)

Requested move 19 December 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 20:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

---

Downsizing (2017 film) → Downsizing (film) – No other page has the name, and no other film with the title has an article. "Downsizing (film)" redirects to the 2017 film. Please move. Paintspot Infez (talk) 21:18, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

• @Paintspot: Need to distinguish from "downsizing a film". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:34, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
• Support unless someone comes forward with evidence that Downsizing is legitimate film terminology. It seems to be a corporate buzzword and not a film term, typically that would be "cutting" instead._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 04:03, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
• Support since there is no other film called Downsizing. Disambiguation is more precise than it needs to be. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 13:41, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
• Support - neither Wiktionary nor Downsizing suggest that the word has any film industry-related definition which could cause confusion if the article is moved as proposed. 79.65.126.84 (talk) 18:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
• Support No other film on WP with this title. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:54, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
• Support per above. Overly precise. Nohomersryan (talk) 21:45, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
• Support It can always be changed down the line to "2017 film" if another comes out with the same name. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 04:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
• Support. This one is distinctly uncontroversial. In fact, the only other entry at the Downsizing disambiguation page is Layoff. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 07:48, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
• Support. Per Erik.--Kevin Dewitt ^{Always ping} 16:32, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
• Support There is only one downsizing it makes sense 2602:304:28AB:9EE0:B404:E174:35E:75AD (talk) 19:44, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
• Support per Erik and Roman. Seduisant (talk) 23:24, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
• Support since there's no other article for a film of the same name. –Matthew - (talk) 16:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Removal of the "premise" section

As the plot section has now been added for the movie, I propose removing the "premise" section. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 04:56, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

When it comes on Blu-ray and DVD, I want Paramount Home Media Distribution do the English closed captioning or subtitles to be the same as Assassin's Creed (2016). — Preceding unsigned comment added by XLS20 (talk • contribs) 15:30, 22 January 2018 (UTC)