Talk:Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Pondicherry
Latest comment: 4 years ago by ToBeFree in topic Regarding this page
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This is separate page for Puducherry Dmk.... Don't confuse with Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam that is Main Party... This is Puducherry Unit of DMK
Regarding this page
editThis is separate page for Puducherry Dmk.. Don't confuse with Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam that is Main Party... This is Puducherry Unit of DMK Nk TheWikipedian (talk) 17:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC) {{Edit fully-protected}}
- The page is not protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:45, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: I tagged this page for speedy deletion because it was basically a cut and paste copy, of the first few sections, of the existing DMK page. (I must admit I didn't check extremely thoroughly after seeing it on the New Pages 'feed', as to my eye they looked exactly the same at the start). I have already said on @Nk TheWikipedian:s' talk page that I don't think we need a branches' page, if it's only 'notability' is a as a branch of the party.
A short "Other than the headquarters, the DMk party has a branch at ###### in Puducherry", on the main page should suffice, if even that much? Regards, 220 of Borg 04:11, 1 June 2020 (UTC)- I think the general approach, WP:A10 aside, is redirection. See WP:ATD-R. To implement what seems to have been the intention behind the speedy deletion request, I have now redirected the page to Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam. I personally have no opinion about the notability of the topic. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:14, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) @ToBeFree: Ah yes, I must keep the redirect option in mind. Thanks for taking the time, you seem to be quite busy at the moment! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 220 of Borg 04:24, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- 220 of Borg, thanks for the kind feedback :) No worries. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:26, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) @ToBeFree: Ah yes, I must keep the redirect option in mind. Thanks for taking the time, you seem to be quite busy at the moment! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 220 of Borg 04:24, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- I think the general approach, WP:A10 aside, is redirection. See WP:ATD-R. To implement what seems to have been the intention behind the speedy deletion request, I have now redirected the page to Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam. I personally have no opinion about the notability of the topic. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:14, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: I tagged this page for speedy deletion because it was basically a cut and paste copy, of the first few sections, of the existing DMK page. (I must admit I didn't check extremely thoroughly after seeing it on the New Pages 'feed', as to my eye they looked exactly the same at the start). I have already said on @Nk TheWikipedian:s' talk page that I don't think we need a branches' page, if it's only 'notability' is a as a branch of the party.