Talk:Drishyam 2
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 5.30.211.68 in topic abusive language used in the article.
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Semi-protected edit request on 20 February 2021
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Mohanlal character name is Georgekutty not Rani Ntrs4mafia (talk) 20:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Already done You might have misread something. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Release section
editin the release section, Streaming in 240 countries can be wrong 2001:8F8:1423:27AC:B19D:5618:4DFB:31CE (talk) 00:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- It is fact. Reliably sourced, directly quoting Vijay Subramaniam, Director and Head, Content, Amazon Prime Video India.--2409:4073:285:B47D:CC5A:2505:60F:AE4B (talk) 15:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Well, two things about that: 1) The source says 240 countries and territories, which is an important distinction that was omitted. 2) While I acknowledge the possibility that the distribution is this wide, it is a controversial claim attributed to a primary source, which makes it a bit unreliable. A corporate suit trying to drum up buzz for a film might exaggerate the figures. It also seems a bit grandiose when you consider the shape of the world. Does every country and territory have the infrastructure to support 1080p+ streaming internet? Maybe. Many places are islands, and some are under totalitarian regimes or practise heavy censorship, or are war torn, some are underdeveloped, some regions are empty wilderness, etc. Are people in Syria, Afghanistan and Yemen chilling and watching Amazon? I mean, maybe, but streaming companies don't exactly allow for any transparency. Anyway, I've adjusted the claim to "worldwide". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- It is quite possible for a film releasing online. Anyway, secondary source added. The Doom Patrol (talk) 17:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Well, two things about that: 1) The source says 240 countries and territories, which is an important distinction that was omitted. 2) While I acknowledge the possibility that the distribution is this wide, it is a controversial claim attributed to a primary source, which makes it a bit unreliable. A corporate suit trying to drum up buzz for a film might exaggerate the figures. It also seems a bit grandiose when you consider the shape of the world. Does every country and territory have the infrastructure to support 1080p+ streaming internet? Maybe. Many places are islands, and some are under totalitarian regimes or practise heavy censorship, or are war torn, some are underdeveloped, some regions are empty wilderness, etc. Are people in Syria, Afghanistan and Yemen chilling and watching Amazon? I mean, maybe, but streaming companies don't exactly allow for any transparency. Anyway, I've adjusted the claim to "worldwide". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2021
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Jvn 2006 (talk) 08:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Please unlock this page to edit there are some mistakes in this page
- Not done: If you want to request the page be unprotected, you can request that over at WP:RPP. Otherwise, if you have specific changes you want to be made, feel free to re-open this request (change "answered=yes" to "answered=no") with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you. Volteer1 (talk) 09:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
abusive language used in the article.
editsome one has introdiced abusive language...starting with 'maa'
someone please remove 5.30.211.68 (talk) 16:45, 20 November 2022 (UTC)