This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Or to say this: the quoted source does not mention either Hungarians in Vojvodina either word nationalist. In fact on page 98 where Dušan Popović is mentioned there is only this sentence: "Dušan Popović indicates how the knowledge of that history is a question of empathy, so that really knowing that history becomes a prerogative reserved exclusively for the Serbs". What this means exactly? Since Dušan Popović wrote books that were named "Srbi u Vojvodini" (Serbs in Vojvodina) or "Srbi u Bačkoj" (Serbs in Bačka) it is logical that he would write about Serbs in these books (Serbs are the title and a subject of such books). I also have another book from other author which is named "Rusini u Vojvodini" (Rusyns in Vojvodina) and which speaks exclusively about Rusyns (not about Serbs, Hungarians or others). Why one should expect that book named "Serbs in Vojvodina" should speak about any other group instead Serbs? I mean, I do not see any evidence by which this author can be described as nationalist. PANONIAN17:19, 5 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
