Talk:Dušan Tadić

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Playing position

edit

I've seen Dusan Tadic play for Groningen, FC Twente and Serbia. I've also interviewed him three times for The Sun newspaper. He's not a winger or left winger, he's a midfielder. He plays on the left, the right, through the middle. Please desist from vandalising his playing position. --94.173.22.24 (talk) 22:11, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 12 January 2015

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 57 14:41, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


Dušan Tadić (footballer)Dušan Tadić – The rationale for currently titling him "Dušan Tadić (footballer)" is that a Serbian war criminal also used that name, despite his page being titled "Duško Tadić". The footballer's page views, even with the spike from scoring against Manchester United, absolutely dwarf those of the war criminal, whose name in reliable sources is Dusko not Dusan anyway. I propose to delete the disambiguation page, and put a hatnote on the footballer's article saying "For the Bosnian Serb war criminal also known as Dušan Tadić, see Duško Tadić" --Relisted.  — Amakuru (talk) 13:05, 21 January 2015 (UTC) '''tAD''' (talk) 01:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Do book references for the footballer dwarf all other people of the same name? In ictu oculi (talk) 10:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
For the moment, that actor has not existed in 12 years of English Wikipedia, so I wouldn't wager anybody was looking for him '''tAD''' (talk) 05:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
User:The Almightey Drill, how does that comment answer the question about books? In ictu oculi (talk) 17:20, 20 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Weak Support. In ictu oculi has a point about the actor, but as he's a bit forgotten, and mostly confined to side roles, the footballer might easily be called the primary topic. I admit there's a bit of WP:RECENTISM, but I think readers would be better served with the setup as proposed, at least for the time being. No such user (talk) 07:53, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. --BDD (talk) 14:56, 22 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Dušan Tadić. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:22, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply