Talk:Dutch expedition to Valdivia

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dutch expedition to Valdivia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303204718/http://www.colonialvoyage.com/dutchchile.html to http://www.colonialvoyage.com/dutchchile.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dutch expedition to Valdivia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 00:29, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

I will take this one. Comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 00:29, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

An interesting article. I've done a little bit of copyediting, please review my changes to check you are OK with them.

Your changes were all improvements.

Comments as follows:

Lead

• Dupe link: Dutch Republic; Spanish Empire

Done.

Background

• Dupe link: Huilliche

Done.

Expedition

• link Hendrik Brouwer on first mention

Done.

• Dupe linl: Valdivia

Done.

• "Except for Brouwer and other leaders, the true objectives were not known to the participants of the expedition." This is a little unclear; are the objectives recited not the true objectives? What did the participants believe was the expedition's purpose?

Added a bit to try and clarify. Does that help? If not I will rewrite it to make clearer.

Chiloé

• Dupe link: Chiloé Archipelago

Done.

• "According to Diego de Rosales...": we need context for who he is; a historian presumably?

Yes. Apologies. Added.

Valdivia

• Manquipillan is not redlinked but Manqueante is?

Done.

Spanish response

• Dupe link: Arauco War (on Mapuche resistance)

Done.

Other stuff

• References: note 10, Robert Kock ref needs formatting using the website template I think, to match note 11. Chile is spelt incorrectly

Done. I think. Wiki-referencing is not a strong point.

• Bibliography: the Lane ref needs dashes in its ISBN.

Done. (Possibly.)

• The Montt Pinto ref needs a place of publication and a OCLC number

Done

• Captions for images shouldn't finish with fullstops

Umm. That's not my reading of MOS:CAPFRAGS. "Most captions are not complete sentences, but merely sentence fragments, which should not end with a period. If any complete sentence occurs in a caption, then all sentences, and any sentence fragments, in that caption should end with a period."

• Images themselves have appropriate tags
• No dablinks
• External links check out OK

That's my review completed. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:59, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

@Zawed: That was embarrassing. Thank you for soldiering through it. Hopefully it is a little better now. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:03, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Have reviewed your changes and comment and this is looking good. I think this is well written and illustrated, covers the subject to an appropriate depth and referenced with reliable sources. Passing as GA now. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:31, 24 August 2018 (UTC)