Talk:Early Lê dynasty

Additional info and citations

The article still needs a lot of work; additional information is needed to write the article. Any sources would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Semancion (talk) 13:11, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Name

I think this article should be renamed "Early Le Dynasty". It is a better translation than "Anterior Le Dynasty". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanhoabui (talk • contribs) 11:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Vietnamese name

Can we get the Vietnamese name of this dynasty? Is there an article on this at the Vietnamese Wiktionary?

Done by User:DHN. Badagnani 07:32, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Name

This name sounds suspiciously like a poor translation from French. Shouldn't it be "Later Lê Dynasty"? "Posterior" is used later in the article, which I also think is probably a poor translation. Badagnani 07:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Intro

Article needs an introductory paragraph. Badagnani 07:43, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Early Lê dynasty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111019134021/http://philosophy.ru/iphras/library/viet.html to http://www.philosophy.ru/iphras/library/viet.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111019134021/http://philosophy.ru/iphras/library/viet.html to http://www.philosophy.ru/iphras/library/viet.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Ban-do-viet-nam-nha Tienle.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:53, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Phrasing of Vietnamese dynastic articles

@Morrisonjohn022:, I saw this edit and wanted to thank you for it, there has been a strong push by a single editor who seems to hate how "the Chinese concept of dynasties" are being used in Vietnamese history articles (some background information here and here, and edits like this). This is mostly a heads up as you might be in for an edit war with a user that tries to apply Champa historiography to general Vietnamese history. --Donald Trung (talk) 10:37, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: thank you for the heads up! I will do my best to avoid edit warring with this editor while upholding the convention of Vietnamese historiography. Morrisonjohn022 (talk) 15:08, 1 July 2022 (UTC)