Talk:Thomas Edison

(Redirected from Talk:Edison)
Latest comment: 6 days ago by 82.194.29.79 in topic Adam olun lan
Former good articleThomas Edison was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 12, 2005Good article nomineeListed
June 11, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 9, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 11, 2024.
Current status: Delisted good article

"Known for" list

edit

It could stand some trimming, couldn't it? "Grasshopper telegraphy" really? I suppose if one were deeply immersed in the radio invention controversy one might know about it, but what basis is there to say that he is "known for" it? 2601:642:4600:D3B0:A1B7:99D2:61CB:C097 (talk) 03:49, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: It's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes you think would improve the article in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.
Remove from the "Known for" list the following items that he is not particularly known for:
  • Grasshopper telegraphy (never developed to practical use, quite obscure outside of radio priority lore, the linked article does not describe it, and the principle is identical with etheric force which article does describe it.)
  • Phonograph doll (redundant as an application of the phonograph, described at its article as "a sales failure")
  • Edison screw (redundant as part of the light bulb)
2601:642:4600:D3B0:DD16:3005:F08A:3DAA (talk) 03:58, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Not done: The Edison screw is certainly noteworthy and is a distinct invention from the Edison Bulb.McYeee (talk) 06:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Reopening, as you did not indicate consideration of the other items. 2601:642:4600:D3B0:DD:ECBB:5E2E:A476 (talk) 14:59, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Reclosing, as edit requests which have been contested to any degree are ineligible for re-introduction into the queue (i.e being marked as answered=no) as the queue is designed for edits which are non-controversial, neutral, and immediately actionable. Please seek consensus before re-opening. —Sirdog (talk) 22:39, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Adam olun lan

edit

Galatasaraaaaay 82.194.29.79 (talk) 14:52, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply