Talk:Edo literature

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Edo literature/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Reading Beans (talk · contribs) 06:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of November 4, 2023, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass

2. Verifiable?: Pass

3. Broad in coverage?: Pass

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass

5. Stable? Pass

6. Images?: Pass

I could be missing something, but, whatever it is can not be so awful. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Reading Beans (talk) 15:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

• I’ve already read this. I’m also re-reading. Minor corrections will be spotted or corrected by me, feel free to revert if you’re not comfortable. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 06:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

• In the Early period "Edegbe and others"—who are these people? I also think that the fourth paragraph should be placed in the second paragraph for chronological sake. 1910s comes before 1920s. Also, as noted in the subsequent section, you mentioned that Roman script wa adopted in the 1930s. Which script was used in the 1910s and 1920s?

This is the things I have seen so far. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 06:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

@Reading Beans I have fixed the above. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:25, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 02:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Edo literature was influenced by British colonialism in the late 19th century, which introduced the Roman script and Christianity to the Edo people? Source: Usuanlele, Uyilawa; Agbontaen, K.A. (2000). "A History of Modern Literary Development Among the Edos 1897–1960". Africa: Rivista trimestrale di studi e documentazione dell'Istituto italiano per l'Africa e l'Oriente. Istituto Italiano per l'Africa e l'Oriente (IsIAO). 55 (1): p.113. ISSN 0001-9747. JSTOR 40761432. Quote: "... literary development in the Roman script among the Edos can safely be traced to British Colonialism which was imposed in the late nineteenth century."

Improved to Good Article status by Vanderwaalforces (talk). Self-nominated at 09:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Edo literature; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• - article's been improved to GA in timeframe, is long enough/in good shape. Hook is cited and interesting - this looks like your second DYK so no QPQ is required. Thanks for writing the article! Kind regards,  Frzzl  talk; contribs  20:19, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Yoruba

Explain the literature related to the traditional year of Edo 102.89.44.253 (talk) 14:22, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, your question is not clear. Please elaborate. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)