Wikipedia

Talk:Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Virginia

Latest comment: 1 year ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress
Learn more about this page
Good articleEffects of Hurricane Isabel in Virginia has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Featured topic starEffects of Hurricane Isabel in Virginia is part of the Hurricane Isabel series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 31, 2007Good article nomineeListed
April 13, 2007Featured topic candidatePromoted
May 30, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Note

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Ref #37 is broken.--165.173.137.8 16:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I wasn't aware people were visiting the page already. Hurricanehink (talk) 19:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Assessment

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Good work on the final Isabel article. I see you've already GA Nominated it.Mitchazenia 15:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA review

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You shouldn't need them, but the good article criteria are here.

  • Well written: Pass, goes into excellent depth in preparations and impact sections.
  • Factually accurate and verifiable: Pass, well-referenced with inline citations.
  • Broad in coverage: Pass, adequately covers details from all parts of the state.
  • NPOV: Pass
  • Stable: Pass
  • Images: Pass, each section has at least one relevant image.

Good work. You should nominate Isabel as a featured topic at some point. --Coredesat 04:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

FT box

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can someone merge this into the {{ArticleHistory}} box please? Tompw (talk) 20:03, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Sweeps Review: Pass

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:14, 31 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Source problem

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have found a problem at source:

National Climatic Data Center (2003). "Event Report for Virginia". Archived from the original on 2012-02-23. Retrieved 2007-02-23. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

The original link is dead almost two years ago, but I try to find it at web archive, the earlist capture is at May 11th, 2008, with another 3 captures later. But the problem is: this source is not what's should be, this is not the "Event Report for Virginia", actually is for California, some strong wind begin at Febuary 3rd, 2004 2:00 PM PST.

And I have already check the source at another article Hurricane Isabel, also had same problem.

Can anyone help me out?--Jarodalien (talk) 15:27, 7 February 2014 (UTC) Hi Jarod - its a well known about problem and i should be able to repoint the links at some stage. It is worth noting though that the reports from the storm events database frequently change their URL. You should be ablr to track it down via the NCDCs website. Once we have the new url we can copy it into the url field and ideally webcite it and copy that url into the archiveurl field while updating the relevant citation parts.Jason Rees (talk) 02:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 18 external links on Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Virginia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Virginia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:23, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:04, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Effects_of_Hurricane_Isabel_in_Virginia&oldid=1211048770"