Talk:Star on the Mountain

(Redirected from Talk:El Paso Star)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk09:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
The El Paso Star illuminated at sunset in 2012

Improved to Good Article status by Bsoyka (talk). Self-nominated at 19:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: None required.

Overall:   There appears to be some close paraphrasing that needs to be reviewed. --evrik (talk) 05:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Evrik: Fixed that up a little, mostly names and a quote now. Bsoyka (talk) 11:53, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:El Paso Star/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 17:10, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  


Overall, it's almost there. The first section could use a reflow to make the paragraphs less choppy, and there are two minor comma items, one minor reference item (and a suggestion), and alt text on the image. @Bsoyka: 7-day hold. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 17:30, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copy changes

edit
  • holiday season, but - remove comma
      Done: Diff. Bsoyka (talk) 19:54, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • November 29, 1940 at - MOS:DATECOMMA needed
      Done: Diff. Bsoyka (talk) 19:54, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • A lot of choppy one- or two-sentence paragraphs in "20th century" header
      Fixed: Combined some of them together, hopefully flows better now. Bsoyka (talk) 02:05, 12 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Other

edit

Review in progress