Talk:Eleanor Duckworth

Split

Much of this Article could be split out. eg. ==The Developmentalist Tradition== & ==Critical Exploration== could both easily stand up for themselves as Articles, and reduce the clutter of this page (and the warning generated on the Edit page). If I knew more about the field I would attempt it, but from the edit history I can see that there are several editors that are a lot more comfortable with the topic. Just a suggestion. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 04:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Critical Exploration Split

This is a great entry - kudos to all who have worked on it. I agree with the above idea of splitting the Critical Exploration section into its own article. Though critical exploration is the product of the work of such people as Duckworth, Piaget and Inhelder, it is not subordinate to any one of their biographies. It stands on its own as a methodology, independent of an individual's story, and so it seems it should stand on its own as an article. S12B3 (talk) 17:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Duckworth.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Duckworth.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:55, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Piaget-Duckworth.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Piaget-Duckworth.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Eleanor Duckworth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928135213/http://www1.ccny.cuny.edu/prospective/education/theneweducator/upload/5th-article-3.pdf to http://www1.ccny.cuny.edu/prospective/education/theneweducator/upload/5th-article-3.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725215212/http://www1.ccny.cuny.edu/prospective/education/theneweducator/upload/4th-article-3.pdf to http://www1.ccny.cuny.edu/prospective/education/theneweducator/upload/4th-article-3.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725215051/http://www1.ccny.cuny.edu/prospective/education/theneweducator/upload/3rd-article-3.pdf to http://www1.ccny.cuny.edu/prospective/education/theneweducator/upload/3rd-article-3.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)