Talk:EliZe

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on EliZe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140328195045/http://dutchcharts.nl//jaaroverzichten.asp?year=2013&cat=s to http://dutchcharts.nl/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on EliZe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090228204442/http://www.radio538.nl/web/show/id%3D44685 to http://www.radio538.nl/web/show/id%3D44685
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://dutchcharts.nl//weekchart.asp?cat=s

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

"Tit song" inclusion

I don't believe it to be relevant, and to this IP, I believe your incessant citations and unsigned messages on my talk page indicate that you might be WP:NOTHERE, but in the spirit of assuming good faith, let's have a discussion about the merit of including this snippet of trivia and how it should be included. PriusGod (talk) 21:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC) Every dutch person who grew up in the 80s or 90s knows this song. It's not mere trivia, it's the song that made EliZe famous. There would not be an article about her had she not performed it. You may have a problem with the song title, but it is perfectly acceptable in Dutch culture. If you are accusing someone of vandalism while removing sourced facts then you might be WP:NOTHERE yourself. Stop trying to distract from the facts. Perhaps you should look up a translation of the lyrics and read more on the subject Children for Children first?

I would appreciate if you cooled it on the accusations, and if you were to format your replies properly and sign them. I believe that the appropriate way to include something like this in the article would be to use the song's actual name, in its original language, not your own/a machine translation. Thus, it would be something like "Het Tietenlied," a name for which the song is notable and the way it is referenced in reliable sources, and not "the Tit Song," a name that is not. If there is a reliable source that refers to the song as "The Tit Song" in the actual text of the source, there would be no problem. PriusGod (talk) 21:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Looks great. Now we can all drop the stick. PriusGod (talk) 22:01, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

You are accusing me of vandalism here. Why would I use a machine to translate something from my native language into my secondary language? Tits is the only possible translation here, they mean exactly the same and even have the same germanic origin. It also fits the context of the song. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A420:6D:692:844C:D969:ADBE:B314 (talk) 22:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Like I said. Your last edit looks great. Sorry for accusing you of vandalism. Now we can stop fighting. PriusGod (talk) 22:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)