This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago7 comments7 people in discussion
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move per proposal. Plurality supports a move, and given the need for disambiguation, the arguments for the current name ring hollow. Orlady (talk) 04:49, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Support. WP:NCPEER is quite clear. This peeress is no longer wholly or exclusively known by her pre-peerage nomenclature. Disambiguation very much needed there are 2 Eluned Morgans and 3 Baroness Morgans. Kittybrewster ☎15:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oppose in the strongest possible terms for consistency in naming per policy and guidelines like WP:COMMONNAME, WP:TITLE, WP:D and WP:PRECISION that apply to all Wikipedia article titles. The subject is most commonly known by the current title (disambiguated per WP:D); adding peerage information is additional precision that is completely unnecessary, all good reasons to ignoreWP:NCPEER. --Born2cycle (talk) 20:10, 1 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
There is a surprising amount of biographical information on this page without references. I've added the refimprove tag and I'm now going to spend some time trying to get some references. I'm also a bit troubled by potentially close association to this article by some of the users who have edited this page in the past, including a user called User:Eluned_Morgan, but I won't jump to any conclusions at the moment. Seaweed (talk) 09:12, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
I've added some references and removed some non-notable information. It's quite tricky to find good, verifiable references because I think that many websites that come up in searches with biographical information probably have got their information from this very Wikipedia page in the past (i.e. without good or any references).Seaweed (talk) 16:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I'd augur that the main thing people know about Eluned Morgan, if they know anything at all, is her close association with the Betsi Cadwaladr crisis. Taking that into consideration, shouldn't it have it's own dedicated section, or at least be part of a broader 'Controversies' section? Gwiltherin (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Last year's vote of no confidence is already in the article. I guess there's no harm in adding a bit more context, but we tend to avoid general "Controversies" sections. To be frank I'm surprised there isn't more about the "crisis" in the Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board article. Sionk (talk) 22:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 months ago13 comments13 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose, although it's fairly futile now: I am not convinced that she is, per NCPEER, almost exclusively known by her personal name. It's true that the BBC refers to her as "Ms Morgan", but the Guardian and Independent both (usually) opt for her title: a small point maybe, but when there is another Eluned Morgan this is the natural disambiguator, and for most of the 2010s she was more commonly referred to as "Baroness Morgan of Ely". Unlike Thatcher or Eden she holds the most important role of her career whilst being a peer. I would wait until she renounces her peerage, if, as she has said, she will do. Cheers – Tim O'Doherty (talk) 21:14, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support, a welcome change, this is Wikipedia not Burke's Peerage. Morgan has always been involved in elected public life so better known by her personal name. Sionk (talk) 09:33, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
.svg){kind=small}
