Talk:England–Scotland football rivalry

Untitled section

I wonder if the main author of this page would consider removing the "paki" reference to England supporters as it is now over 13 years old. Perhaps it might be replaced by a reference to andy Murray and the media coverage of his ABE?? More up to date and more valid?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.222.69.78 (talk) 21:32, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on England–Scotland football rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090101160956/http://www.heartsfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/HeartsHistory/0%2C%2C10289~985232%2C00.html to http://www.heartsfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/HeartsHistory/0%2C%2C10289~985232%2C00.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://sport.scotsman.com/jockstein/The-green-shoots-of-recovery.2660234.jp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516220311/http://www.sportingo.com/football/a8532_can-keegans-newcastle-help-scotland-produce-players-worthy-premier-league to http://www.sportingo.com/Football/a8532_Can-Keegans-Newcastle-help-Scotland-produce-players-worthy-Premier-League
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080908025844/http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/comment/columnists/sport-columnists/stuart-cosgrove/2007/03/29/i-would-walk-500-miles-to-savour-hampden-roar-86908-18824838/ to http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/comment/columnists/sport-columnists/stuart-cosgrove/2007/03/29/i-would-walk-500-miles-to-savour-hampden-roar-86908-18824838/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080219181426/http://www.uefa.com/competitions/euro/history/season%3D1996/round%3D227/match%3D52485/index.html to http://www.uefa.com/competitions/euro/history/season%3D1996/round%3D227/match%3D52485/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Records

Hi JMorrison

Following your previous undoing of an edit that you described as confusing; I have re-added the relevant info but re-worded intended to address your opinion that the previous wording was confusing. If you feel the added content is still confusing it would be appreciated if you could specify what in the added content confuses you.

Any constructive consideration of this is appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.118.187.106 (talk) 05:59, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Women's football

Just wondering if it is worth mentioning the forthcoming game between England and Scotland in the Women's World Cup this June or not? Is this page only covering men's matches? ISD (talk) 08:25, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

I would say go ahead, and also mention the previous Euros match. The rivalry is based on that between the two countries overall rather than a competitive one which might not apply to the women's game. IMO it is worthy of a mention. Crowsus (talk) 10:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)