Talk:English cricket team in New Zealand in 2012–13
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Statistics
editWhy does somebody keep changing the statistics by replacing 1st with first, 2nd with second etc.??? Migitgem2009 (talk) 21:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
- Because it is correct, per MOS:NUM. – PeeJay 21:54, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah I got that.....I meant why change it from numbers to words? It's annoying -_- Migitgem2009 (talk) 23:27, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
- Nevermind......just realised that the MOS:NUM was a link rather than part of your signiture :) Migitgem2009 (talk) 23:30, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah I got that.....I meant why change it from numbers to words? It's annoying -_- Migitgem2009 (talk) 23:27, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on English cricket team in New Zealand in 2012–13. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130208223247/http://www.blackcaps.co.nz/news/international/1/blackcaps-twenty20-and-odi-squads-named/10507/article.aspx to http://www.blackcaps.co.nz/news/international/1/blackcaps-twenty20-and-odi-squads-named/10507/article.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 24 December 2016 (UTC)